Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 21 April 2015 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484C91AC3DB for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bIgR1t2Ao5og for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A52D81AC407 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t3LEUai6047973 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:30:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:30:36 -0500
Message-ID: <F763B6D0-3B7A-4415-A87C-868FA335ECBA@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJ8_LhgDhzzC+0VJHBnP2TmjsD-KuKJYH_aSJ_xQwc67Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150421040227.10493.84257.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJ8_LhgDhzzC+0VJHBnP2TmjsD-KuKJYH_aSJ_xQwc67Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/XvM0zJBG53JzOLcOZrkRCjvCbq8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:31:29 -0700
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv.shepherd@ietf.org, isis-chairs@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:30:50 -0000

On 21 Apr 2015, at 9:23, Barry Leiba wrote:

>> -- Section 5, 2nd paragraph: "The implementation SHOULD also allow
>>  operators to control the configuration of 'send' and/or 'verify' the
>>  feature of IS-IS PDUs for the links and for the node."
>>
>> I don't understand the sentence
>
> I think "of 'send' and/or 'verify' the feature" is supposed to be "of
> the 'send' and/or 'verify' feature".  The "the" is misplaced.
>

That move would make it parse better. I assume it's just a typo or 
cut/paste error.

> Barry