[ipwave] 802.11p minor textual issue

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 18 May 2017 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D525127A90 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id feBiOOu39NDL for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3161293EE for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27B2300526 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:38:06 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id wiKpaBmNUCcA for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.141] (vpn.snozzages.com [204.42.252.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A24D30029F; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <A0A28D59-30CC-44FD-90FB-9030EDB8E794@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7222925F-6A5B-47D7-8052-B6D60FA019A8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 09:38:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <b7d0f246-da90-ac56-db69-40e9e929900d@gmail.com>
Cc: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <b7d0f246-da90-ac56-db69-40e9e929900d@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/UkGYMpCE9xmVD4bq417_C_y4IQQ>
Subject: [ipwave] 802.11p minor textual issue
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:43:23 -0000

> On May 18, 2017, at 5:39 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> OLD:
>> The link 802.11 OCB was specified in IEEE Std 802.11p(TM)-2010
>> [ieee802.11p-2010] as an amendment to the 802.11 specifications
> 
> It was suggested that the "802.11 specifications" are in fact "IEEE Std
> 802.11-2007".  As such the resolution is:
> 
> NEW:
>> The link 802.11 OCB was specified in IEEE Std 802.11p(TM)-2010
>> [ieee802.11p-2010] as an amendment to IEEE Std 802.11-2007
> 
> End issue.

Alex:

I do not believe that the "(TM)" should appear in the name.  I suggest IEEE Std 802.11p-2010.

Also, it might help people locate the specification if we tell people that OCB was first specified in IEEE Std 802.11p-2010 as an amendment to IEEE Std 802.11-2007, and then it was incorporated into the base standard in …

Russ