IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] RSU minor textual issue

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 29 May 2017 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AADE129AD1 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.367
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14DjQBUAt9cV for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596F4129AD0 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v4TFug3c057253; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:56:42 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8891C205816; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:56:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A0220580F; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:56:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.45] ([132.166.84.45]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v4TFufv8012419; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:56:42 +0200
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <b7d0f246-da90-ac56-db69-40e9e929900d@gmail.com> <3916AFEC-80E9-469F-A2D7-F66010AAB23C@vigilsec.com>
Cc: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c40e3d6a-dd42-e2bb-8ec2-e62582454970@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 18:56:40 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3916AFEC-80E9-469F-A2D7-F66010AAB23C@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/xDyjyBzQa-WMpodwTI6hHwVKWKo>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] RSU minor textual issue
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:56:45 -0000


Le 18/05/2017 à 15:33, Russ Housley a écrit :
>
>> On May 18, 2017, at 5:39 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
>> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> OLD:
>>> RSU: Road Side Unit. An IP router equipped with, or connected to, at
>>> least one interface that is 802.11 and that is an interface that
>>> operates in OCB mode.
>>
>> A comment was made stating that an RSU is not a router, and that an RSU
>> may be connected to a router via an interface, e.g. Ethernet, to access
>> the infrastructure if required.
>>
>> But I think that some Road Side Units are indeed IP routers and they
>> access the infrastructure and the Internet.  This is an important point
>> when using the IP protocol - be connected.
>>
>> I think I keep that text that way at this time.
>>
>> End issue.
>
> Alex:
>
> Some RSUs will be routers, but others will not.  For example, an RSU
> that sends messages to vehicles about foggy conditions does not need to
> be a router.  I think the definition should allow both cases.

Russ,

I propose the following new definition.  It allows both cases:

>         RSU: Road Side Unit.  A computer equipped with at least one
>         IEEE 802.11 interface operated in OCB mode.  An RSU may be
>         connected to the Internet, and may be equipped with additional
>         wired or wireless network interfaces running IP.

Alex

>
> Russ
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email