Re: [its] New draft on scenarios and requirements for IP in ITS

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Seil,

Thank you for the message.

I agree mainly with your points.  I find it useful to the future reader
if the scenarios where grouped in classes: necessities of vehicle
communications, high bandwidth availability, and other generica problems.

This may also to separate the requirements which are more specific to
vehicular communications, rather than generic fixed communications.

Is this what you mean?

Do you think a modification of the draft should be done?

Alex

Le 25/07/2012 18:14, Seil Jeon a écrit :
> Hi Alex,
>
>
> Regarding on Section 3 Scenarios, I would classify them with
> following categories.
>
> Scenarios 1, 3 might be the necessities of vehicle communications
>
> Scenarios 2 describes high wireless accesses availability on current
> network environment
>
> Scenario 4 - it might be one of requirements.
>
> Scenario 5 - it sounds somewhat generic problem to me where every
> node to have Internet connection is facing.
>
> ...
>
> My opinion is would we need to specify them focused on necessities
> of vehicular communications?
>
> Those would be much better to understand requirements followed.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Seil
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu Sent:
> Friday, July 13, 2012 6:05 PM To: [e-mail] Subject: [its] New
> draft on scenarios and requirements for IP in ITS
>
> Participants to ITS informal effort at IETF,
>
> Per our recent discussions, we submitted a new draft about scenarios
> and requirements for IP in ITS:
>
> draft-petrescu-its-scenarios-reqs-01.txt
>
> I would like to request feedback about the scenarios and
> requirements described in this draft.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Alex and on behalf of co-authors.
>
>
>