IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [its] New draft on scenarios and requirements for IP in ITS

"Seil Jeon" <seiljeon@av.it.pt> Wed, 25 July 2012 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <seiljeon@av.it.pt>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6000A21F86D0 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ubrCqIcFWvr for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av.it.pt (mail.av.it.pt [193.136.92.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2C921F86CF for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.21.32] (account seiljeon@av.it.pt HELO ATNoGSeil) by av.it.pt (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPSA id 65569035; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:14:00 +0100
From: Seil Jeon <seiljeon@av.it.pt>
To: 'Alexandru Petrescu' <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <5000551E.9000800@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5000551E.9000800@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:14:01 +0100
Message-ID: <000c01cd6a80$8115a550$8340eff0$@av.it.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQE9yEKjmsKSOjOZNCYEpfBUzNfuGZhZZ7Xw
Content-Language: ko
Cc: its@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [its] New draft on scenarios and requirements for IP in ITS
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Intelligent Transportation Systems discussion list." <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/its>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:19:03 -0000

Hi Alex,


Regarding on Section 3 Scenarios, I would classify them with following
categories.

Scenarios 1, 3 might be the necessities of vehicle communications

Scenarios 2 describes high wireless accesses availability on current network
environment

Scenario 4 - it might be one of requirements. 

Scenario 5 - it sounds somewhat generic problem to me where every node to
have Internet connection is facing.

...

My opinion is would we need to specify them focused on necessities of
vehicular communications?

Those would be much better to understand requirements followed.


Regards,

Seil


-----Original Message-----
From: its-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 6:05 PM
To: its@ietf.org
Subject: [its] New draft on scenarios and requirements for IP in ITS

Participants to ITS informal effort at IETF,

Per our recent discussions, we submitted a new draft about scenarios and
requirements for IP in ITS:

          draft-petrescu-its-scenarios-reqs-01.txt

I would like to request feedback about the scenarios and requirements
described in this draft.

Thanks in advance,

Alex and on behalf of co-authors.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email