IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP and cellular for vehicular networks

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 04 October 2021 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537B63A1358 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 02:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snTFArppmVbN for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 02:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD443A1356 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 02:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1949qiB0017717 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:52:44 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A0325205AC7 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:52:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB81205160 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:52:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1949qiqv008328 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:52:44 +0200
To: IPWAVE WG <its@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8d49b3c9-f0cc-6896-b906-b7c4b92367af@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:52:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/bccIf3P4ZRxRUwUCcCGj_Einj8I>
Subject: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP and cellular for vehicular networks
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 09:52:51 -0000

Hi, IPWAVErs,

I gave a brief presentation of the IPWAVE WG, RFC8691 and Vehicular 
Networks I-D to the ITU CITS 'Collaboration on ITS Standards', in 
September, 2021.

This is the feedback I received:

	Bring the cellular kind of work, like IP-over-cellular, in
	IPWAVE WG.  This request is so because:
		- because China efforts on cellular and because
		  USA FCC regulation changes at 5.9GHz to include
		  C-V2X ('C'==cellular).
		- because at ETSI it is thought that it is easy
		  to do IP over any access layer, be it 802.11-OCB
		  or a cellular kind of link layer.

What do you think?

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email