Re: [jose] Consensus calls

HI.

Could you please specify which drafts for item 3?

Nat

2013/3/28 Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>

> <chair>
>
> The following "decisions" were made at the face to face meeting.  This
> message is to ratify these decisions on the list.  You have one week to
> object and provide a solid defense of your objection or the actions will be
> considered as adopted.  Note that for some of these we are running slightly
> ahead of our charter changes but this is not expected to be a problem
>
> 1.  Adopt the proposed compromise language from John Bradley's presentation
> dealing with the critical language.  This is to adopt points 1, 2, 3 and 4
> but not point 5.  (presentation is available on the materials website
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/slides/slides-86-jose-4.pdf).
>
> 2.  The private fields of public/private key algorithms and the symmetric
> key field are to be folded into the mail JWA draft.
>
> 3. The multiple recipient/signer serialization drafts are to be folded into
> the JWE and JWS drafts respectively.
>
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en