IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] updated draft charter text incorporating AD's comments

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 08 April 2013 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1138721F877A for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l7CU6EmBCN2f for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188F121F8648 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A51B4004E; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:49:24 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51635528.40909@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:39:20 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <513CCD31.8050408@isoc.org> <515EC38F.2060703@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <515EC38F.2060703@ieca.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] updated draft charter text incorporating AD's comments
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:39:24 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4/5/13 6:29 AM, Sean Turner wrote:

> 2. (hard one) Barry's been told by some App folks who are working
> on new JSON-based protocols that they don't see the applicability
> of JOSE to their work.

Have we heard *why*? Do they not need or want signing and encryption?
Do they think there are technical problems with the solutions being
proposed in the JOSE WG? Do they have aesthetic objections? It would
help to know more about the concerns being expressed (and why they are
not being expressed in the JOSE WG but instead in private to an area
directory).

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=NNLU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email