Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts

+1

I think it's good.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:49 PM, hideki nara <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp> wrote:
> +1
> ---
> hideki
>
> 2015-07-13 2:32 GMT+09:00 Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Sorry to chime in so late. I have been completely under water for sometime
>> now.
>>
>> Like Phil, I do see that draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options sort
>> of thing can be very useful, though I may want to have slightly different
>> way of encoding the things. Being able to do detached signature is quite
>> attractive.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Nat
>>
>> 2015-07-10 2:37 GMT+09:00 Kathleen Moriarty
>> <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> About
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00,
>>> I’ll add that this addresses the requests make by Jim Schaad and Richard
>>> Barnes in JOSE Issues #26 “Allow for signature payload to not be base64
>>> encoded” and #23 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/23 “Make
>>> crypto independent of binary encoding (base64)”.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> About
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01,
>>> I’ll add that this addresses the request made by Jim Schaad in JOSE Issue #2
>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/2 “No key management for
>>> MAC”.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, there’s a highly relevant discussion about key management for MACs
>>> going on in the COSE working group.  See the thread “[Cose] Key management
>>> for MACs (was Re: Review of draft-schaad-cose-msg-01)” – especially
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/aUehU6O7Ui8CXcGxy3TquZOxWH4 and
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/ouOIdAOe2P-W8BjGLJ7BNvvRr10.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> One could take the view that our decision on the JOSE key management
>>> draft should be informed by the related decision in COSE.  Specifically,
>>> that if COSE decides to support key management for MACs, the same reasoning
>>> likely should apply to our decision on whether to define a standard
>>> mechanism for supporting key management for MACs in JOSE.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Key management is explicitly out-of-scope for COSE as stated in the
>>> charter.  The discussion referenced had this point at the close of that
>>> discussion.
>>>
>>> I'm not seeing much support for these drafts moving forward in JOSE.  I'm
>>> also not seeing enough to justify standards track and AD sponsored.  If you
>>> think these are important to have move forward in the WG or as standards
>>> track, please say so soon.  They can still go forward through the
>>> Independent submission process through the ISE.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Kathleen
>>>
>>>                                                             -- Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: jose [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:38 AM
>>> To: jose@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two
>>> remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include:
>>> 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual
>>> drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your
>>> thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would
>>> like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15
>>> July.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Karen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jose mailing list
>>> jose@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jose mailing list
>>> jose@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
>> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
>> http://nat.sakimura.org/
>> @_nat_en
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>

-- 
HAYASHI, Tatsuya
Lepidum Co. Ltd.