IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed rechartering for the JSON WG

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 10 February 2014 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AB61A06F2 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MF9qL2Y0frZT for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFD31A06E5 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B742C806C for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=UyM6uRzg/5dxqa9h4EHK YoLrEvg=; b=BfSe9H01Z2W+rID6EKht9OIn8VqXJrHTXpdIwc35plnTiDqg+DTY K3I/K0PctrNNkd82efFJvh11aSdntfzmvo0YdxLYtT39QNH4VDW7BBUpc3G/M7Wl P0P6tpmFYBhKcMobEr7Xb/Qv9llENKJolU0W6fpn7ACcUUF/Jxr2J3k=
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8E202C806B for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hn9so3008291wib.12 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CwJsd4iaMTdhjW6Nin0nB4wzo+LT9GiO7vtxIn1jP4U=; b=Xc3ujk1vExBCB0nMpJhrB+djrh82XQlEh2oCy/qR+FcxWDbFInD9MYU8mdhGKWky9d PjemdIyjbpP2xR4/kMs9DKbFdKve+B1fOHgXXT3zgCgS6Z+rYriBTm5Usq1Ku0pP47VC 4a96Doqor/a6JHPQWp3ad5zWbUnQO2zhie60FQ9leeRGDbQPJ1eBZ70zWDGuF8JnoRaa NKi99cj2mF4xk2gmymoy5ZMByXqaoNJb731fZHLZ3WVRR4YqkXZ+dfjE4DorM87p52Ig 8l8b4WUTFFySCPBUCzXNMtYxn35G3UBxabGotV8S32mqORIYRInCEyl8BYHlcG9+lhXW XXtw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.236.9 with SMTP id uq9mr22515071wjc.31.1392050464366; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.108.132 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:41:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwgqu+71pxmUoi4HyodiuavCbMEyJxbQRTmUaQALx-6MWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <52D9B39C.5020102@cisco.com> <1C1347D2-0D99-4D49-B4C1-199246167D23@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwj0phrmP563tBbZJKHeYw=Azh1as6GZOA6rANPpC6PJgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iv+-9xQYAjZdfZk7+GeA6J+sjaV5era3L+PiJ9RoauBYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwh0O4+iuaJMUhYgj+0GS8e9b_nZtNNX91hOmjUypsgkTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhu0GZY9CVQrqD4SyjHLVEoEg1DtYj_6imZbbHtzX2eEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iuR0MPm9q483jBMqTRkGV1f2giGNhp+UciQ7rRnrvcEBA@mail.gmail.com> <C271F837-40FD-4E87-A56B-0F0357553923@mnot.net> <7E1F7FE6-E7A9-4B7D-902C-A60D39B7B994@vpnc.org> <8AA70C014EEED3158A177F1C@cyrus.local> <85017697-48CF-420F-9935-B78193953493@tzi.org> <CAMm+Lwie3B8+pyXNuuoMn6nWLy7Bva4vmsdZ0b2yTACrUL8xpQ@mail.gmail.com> <B9C98CBC-D63E-4A42-AB4C-9752B3A34C11@mnot.net> <CAK3OfOhrwprBoA9KFgZP9KaoX9eygnWf-aPpMe-JVLOYUphCBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwgqu+71pxmUoi4HyodiuavCbMEyJxbQRTmUaQALx-6MWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:41:04 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOhAyZ0QU0V8YXn4mvJnws3R4k-hLXBuPCHbiOyNS9tGHA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed rechartering for the JSON WG
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:41:07 -0000

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
>>
>> There's no reason that we should have a single schema language, and
>> for any document it should suffice to use whichever schema language
>> (if any), is most appropriate.  Therefore I wouldn't suggest that the
>> WG have a [single] standard schema as a work item, but I'm not sure
>> what we stand to gain from having only Informational schema languages
>> -- they can't be used to specify Standards-Track protocols.  If
>> there's no appetite for working on one or more schema languages, so be
>> it.
>
> This is no longer the case.
>
> Internet Standards have been allowed to down-reference Informational for a
> long time now. There are some additional steps but they are minor.
>
> Since the schema itself only describes the data format, it does not even
> need compliance language.

Then I'm happy with all JSON schema docs being Informational (and not
even WG work items).

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email