IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed rechartering for the JSON WG

Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name> Sun, 09 February 2014 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan@drees.name>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8F41A01DE for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 09:01:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PtJvF9Wf50i for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 09:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8236B1A03CC for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 09:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newyork.local.box ([80.187.101.30]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQvkQ-1Vmjg3499y-00UGEA for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:01:18 +0100
Message-ID: <52F7B45C.80401@drees.name>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:01:16 +0100
From: Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
References: <52D9B39C.5020102@cisco.com> <1C1347D2-0D99-4D49-B4C1-199246167D23@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwj0phrmP563tBbZJKHeYw=Azh1as6GZOA6rANPpC6PJgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iv+-9xQYAjZdfZk7+GeA6J+sjaV5era3L+PiJ9RoauBYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwh0O4+iuaJMUhYgj+0GS8e9b_nZtNNX91hOmjUypsgkTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhu0GZY9CVQrqD4SyjHLVEoEg1DtYj_6imZbbHtzX2eEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iuR0MPm9q483jBMqTRkGV1f2giGNhp+UciQ7rRnrvcEBA@mail.gmail.com> <C271F837-40FD-4E87-A56B-0F0357553923@mnot.net> <7E1F7FE6-E7A9-4B7D-902C-A60D39B7B994@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7E1F7FE6-E7A9-4B7D-902C-A60D39B7B994@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kDLnMPSo1zUAQXPLzjOgwRQxMHiX0boV76ioEJQ3+Za49dVOpbq 4NmWnKh8esMFVY3boZDJE2Q2U7k3lBOZlbV/0tY5xUDtyGLt5QnW3c65jy42V8Q5nSozXsY KUORWFHxdut2MXpazD9n3/wEbVKnMk1MO1OmR+kxi4jVEkRbfm6Lrlvy6mhYhE8h0ethvzG WgRbBXt68v0l6dV/hj5BA==
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed rechartering for the JSON WG
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stefan@drees.name
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:01:20 -0000

Am 09.02.14 04:13, schrieb Paul Hoffman:
> On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:37 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> I’d be more comfortable if the charter were more explicit about
>> this;
>> e.g., “A set of natural-language terms and/or phrases for use in future
>> specifications that use JSON. This explicitly excludes schema languages
>> and similar formalisms.”
>
> Do the folks who earlier +1'd the proposed text like Mark's reformulation? ...

+1 and yes, absolutely - from my side!

{"Stefan": true}

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email