IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed rechartering for the JSON WG

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Sun, 09 February 2014 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A9B1A061B for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:57:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aR_ckMuG9nzR for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (mailbigip.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCE21A0561 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E574A2005D106 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=Dy5dTOm41ZQFaxWB1k3R +u485Pw=; b=y+zK1kfLPmXkMMHDNkbyk+Y19TUGM10Eu/lXFQVdU4p14eRGJS2m XSY1rPKB3PwarX4+aUlkIK6djLzoRF4cX4CMurjsCDUY+4NzAlzMkVYxNSjuyiUz shgOoPTPEoLXlJp1UcMsZ4hTKY61KLrTjfJQJZ1mhlg1eg9HCE8QrsM=
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CECF2005D105 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t61so3615103wes.8 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 14:57:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oQPKyl08c07O/nO9UOdlgshYhM3Gz1RC+MAa/cGerUw=; b=Q3mXjQuufI43nvON5VQ/OTli0xhJ7KVq8b6W0bNXdw2qV8jxatwM0tcxBbHRyoifUC slORyCcCqY7QktmWSQhHvTLHC3pVz99UweP5QdTA/KMX/riHGOeZ+EeY5aiZLBYGzqE+ +bkmcxTJNYbEc+FnSz9USAt02OklyKSbSct+ePuXvMUAQeweb4rDjoxWGPIRCSI21El7 jAs4YuGCl8FSmOKfPToGwIf+zicdl3irydaaF6wb4hZSLmRv75mrvdUTep5QjMyO9s+u 3y5Vy/2hsv00Uis9H0YYjq6lnXb4IF0oXhGPuXzswz5BbHHDdd3bUmytCH2Tm8KZVlc0 S3PA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.160.206 with SMTP id xm14mr7995107wib.25.1391986669027; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 14:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.198.69 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:57:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B9C98CBC-D63E-4A42-AB4C-9752B3A34C11@mnot.net>
References: <52D9B39C.5020102@cisco.com> <1C1347D2-0D99-4D49-B4C1-199246167D23@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwj0phrmP563tBbZJKHeYw=Azh1as6GZOA6rANPpC6PJgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iv+-9xQYAjZdfZk7+GeA6J+sjaV5era3L+PiJ9RoauBYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwh0O4+iuaJMUhYgj+0GS8e9b_nZtNNX91hOmjUypsgkTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhu0GZY9CVQrqD4SyjHLVEoEg1DtYj_6imZbbHtzX2eEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iuR0MPm9q483jBMqTRkGV1f2giGNhp+UciQ7rRnrvcEBA@mail.gmail.com> <C271F837-40FD-4E87-A56B-0F0357553923@mnot.net> <7E1F7FE6-E7A9-4B7D-902C-A60D39B7B994@vpnc.org> <8AA70C014EEED3158A177F1C@cyrus.local> <85017697-48CF-420F-9935-B78193953493@tzi.org> <CAMm+Lwie3B8+pyXNuuoMn6nWLy7Bva4vmsdZ0b2yTACrUL8xpQ@mail.gmail.com> <B9C98CBC-D63E-4A42-AB4C-9752B3A34C11@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:57:48 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOhrwprBoA9KFgZP9KaoX9eygnWf-aPpMe-JVLOYUphCBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed rechartering for the JSON WG
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:57:52 -0000

There's no reason that we should have a single schema language, and
for any document it should suffice to use whichever schema language
(if any), is most appropriate.  Therefore I wouldn't suggest that the
WG have a [single] standard schema as a work item, but I'm not sure
what we stand to gain from having only Informational schema languages
-- they can't be used to specify Standards-Track protocols.  If
there's no appetite for working on one or more schema languages, so be
it.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email