Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format?
John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Mon, 17 June 2013 11:55 UTC
Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8F221F9963 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5wJDKVG2qK5H for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0402A21F9294 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1UoY1O-0004ac-5X; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:54:54 -0400
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:54:54 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Norbert Lindenberg <ietf@lindenbergsoftware.com>
Message-ID: <20130617115453.GC19150@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <6FC6B441-B74D-4B9F-B883-065C05890880@lindenbergsoftware.com> <51BE8DEA.7030307@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <118A7923-5D66-4EF5-8A78-CAE125032010@lindenbergsoftware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <118A7923-5D66-4EF5-8A78-CAE125032010@lindenbergsoftware.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format?
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:55:11 -0000
Norbert Lindenberg scripsit: > Maybe you have a better term for it: What I mean in the ECMAScript > context is the format that the functions JSON.parse and JSON.stringify > parse and produce [1]. This simply is the description of JSON at the level of characters. -- Almost all theorems are true, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> but almost all proofs have bugs. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --Paul Pedersen
- [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Norbert Lindenberg
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Tony Hansen
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Norbert Lindenberg
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Scope: Wire format or runtime format? Jorge