IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus on Whether or Not to Adopt Nomenclature Document(s) in the Charter

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Sat, 15 March 2014 02:56 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D121A026E for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QyObn3WT8XYZ for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76001A0236 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y1so2273875lam.6 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Be4TQvt4tDFZJicwdzFRbjikDifY2IvSrcHQCfGZ5rU=; b=OXtt4hKrR3xH3lvKk+D/FFP0xOGKMoSnH1N4M0mRGRMPP6nWeTgl6kc6fPBDXvph2T tyz4vzGY3ASX0cw1uE2Fk451DnAYXGBENXmFz5smikV24bM1xV+O1xxMtopwCgssJ+o1 a6KbG2NkwPSa4zR9m6UAwQ8uzrLwKEicwLMmgGb/VjjS/QrDg5ynlidafFmPjql/k4pH Ag6IlK/5I9lfVAR4frCR8HXkiLkWDvnF8sRtFE3WuQiyV7/LlQ0yVqiTjY22L0DSX6WM qWCqAnEc4aqETeQhTpZBbnpAgvGh6GFpGOyu9QRO/ziTgXg40tSlTng3SwpPhRWFfcMt 08xw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.153.7.200 with SMTP id de8mr7928218lad.19.1394852154064; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <420F0699-9F27-435E-924C-28966A743EAF@vpnc.org>
References: <53238F2E.5010105@cisco.com> <CAHBU6itv0q7ZTrran+dKTcUxoSxNHYnND7yLmSPF35--iUMA+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwi6Ha0r55vb3VNsgz40Bds6HYZ-aM9u-JwyVmoRDuZaWw@mail.gmail.com> <420F0699-9F27-435E-924C-28966A743EAF@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:55:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwifeLYJKa1RKiiQtzEbT9+O6DQF_EWdU=PeThEdbZ38Dw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137e9862847b904f49c537c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/K2s0YnPGsXCnAnOdA2hlJvWbMeQ
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus on Whether or Not to Adopt Nomenclature Document(s) in the Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:56:03 -0000

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On Mar 14, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think RFC 6962 could be improved substantially with some greater
> adherence to some structure.
>
> Could you maybe take that discussion to the trans working group? It is not
> relevant to this WG. Thanks!
>
> --Paul Hoffman


Tim asked for an example of a JSON specification that would be improved by
a schema. I gave him one.


-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email