Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG
John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Wed, 16 October 2013 17:28 UTC
Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B3221F9AD8 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BlgpylcmtF-g for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDCE11E81E8 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1VWUtb-0000Zj-S9; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:28:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:28:31 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <20131016172831.GC9701@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <29850F92-23F1-4859-BB5A-BB5F1F20DD38@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <29850F92-23F1-4859-BB5A-BB5F1F20DD38@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:28:48 -0000
Paul Hoffman scripsit: > Greetings again. While our AD ponders the 4627bis document (probably on > its way to IETF Last Call), the Working Group can start to think about > what it wants to do next, if anything. The chairs have heard of at least > four topics that the WG might or might not want to add to its charter: application/json fragment identifiers should be added to this list. There seems to be a fairly mature proposal along the lines of the XPointer "element" scheme. Some people don't like it because you can't tell by examining a fragment id what type of JSON value it references. By the same token, however, you can't tell by examining a URI pointing to a JSON document what JSON type it references either. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan The whole of Gaul is quartered into three halves. --Julius Caesar
- [Json] Possible next work for the WG Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Barry Leiba
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG R S