Re: [Jsonpath] May interim meeting minutes

I reproduce the notes from our meeting last month.  I see quite a few
action items there … if our meeting next week is going to be useful, it
would be nice to see some of the PRs submitted.  Thanks to Stefan for
getting this started - I think he needs help getting his PR untangled?

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:33 PM James <james.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you to all who attended our first interim meeting - the minutes
> are available on Datatracker[1] however at time of writing this email
> the recording is not yet on Youtube.
>
> The consensus and action points as I gathered:
>
> # Terminology - #84
> Consensus: Sticking with the term "node" implying the location and the
> value
>
> Action: Greg to PR the terminology
>
>
> # Relative Path Support - #59
> Consensus: Queries should not begin with @, but this is a natural
> extension point.
>
> Action: Chairs to update the Github issue and allow for non-attendees to
> reply
> Action: Write an extensibility model
>
>
> # Regular Expressions in Filters - #70
> Consensus: Regular expressions can be included once we have a specific
> proposal
> Consensus: Only permit literals in regular expressions
>
> Action: Carsten to attempt a PR
> Action: Cover DoS in the security considerations of the document
>
>
> # Duplicates in Selector output - #23
> Consensus: Duplicate removal won't be part of the document
>
> Action: Marko to write the descendants PR
>
>
> # Filter Expressions - #64
> Action: Stefan to write PR
>
> If there are any questions or corrections please let me know.
>
> A poll for the June interim will be sent out soon.
>
> James & Tim
> JSONPath Chairs
>
>
> 1:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2021-jsonpath-01-202105110900/
>
> --
> Jsonpath mailing list
> Jsonpath@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
>