IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue

Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se> Tue, 07 May 2013 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lha@kth.se>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D3721F919A for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iv8fAQeo5C7F for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.160]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDD521F8F28 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C0114DCB1; Tue, 7 May 2013 20:23:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se
Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se ([130.237.32.160]) by mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kwOqGYqmkImD; Tue, 7 May 2013 20:22:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-KTH-Auth: lha [17.212.162.217]
X-KTH-mail-from: lha@kth.se
Received: from [17.212.162.217] (unknown [17.212.162.217]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0177814DCA8; Tue, 7 May 2013 20:22:51 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_183C4934-3CDB-48A3-8588-F5715F30E53A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1750\))
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
In-Reply-To: <518944F0.8050504@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 11:22:47 -0700
Message-Id: <93ED5FE4-9DAB-40F5-81FE-3AFF54F0C536@kth.se>
References: <x7d4neg555c.fsf@equal-rites.mit.edu> <4969FAFD-094B-4774-B3B9-9B611FBF821A@kth.se> <518944F0.8050504@mit.edu>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1750)
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 18:23:41 -0000

7 maj 2013 kl. 11:16 skrev Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>:

> On 05/07/2013 02:02 PM, Love Hörnquist Åstrand wrote:
>> 2 is not an option, its 5 or 1. prefer 1. doubtless after doing interop
>> testing we'll find more issues.
> 
> Can you please explain your objection to #3?

it require changes. I fine with saying REQUIRE framing, but if you want to interop, you better consider accept unframed too.

Love

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email