IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue

Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu> Wed, 08 May 2013 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411BC21F8D00 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VMSf-ZNdUEl for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE6021F8EBD for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C921820488; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:45:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfqAjRE1uyNU; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:45:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.0.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:45:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 1EF774499; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
References: <x7d4neg555c.fsf@equal-rites.mit.edu> <4969FAFD-094B-4774-B3B9-9B611FBF821A@kth.se> <518944F0.8050504@mit.edu> <51894A24.7000507@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:47:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <51894A24.7000507@mit.edu> (Greg Hudson's message of "Tue, 07 May 2013 14:38:28 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslli7pmq25.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 15:47:41 -0000

Greg, presumably MIt would need to send unframed messages if it gets an
unframed acceptor message as well.

That is, I think your option works but your description of the appendix
is incomplete.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email