Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> Wed, 08 May 2013 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ghudson@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FAC21F9467 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a3Dp16h4-zCo for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-5.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F1621F90AC for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074422-b7f5b6d00000095d-6f-518a74cadefd
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id E8.04.02397.AC47A815; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:52:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r48FqfOb018674; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:52:41 -0400
Received: from [18.101.8.202] (VPN-18-101-8-202.MIT.EDU [18.101.8.202]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as ghudson@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r48FqdY3018553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 May 2013 11:52:40 -0400
Message-ID: <518A74C7.1060504@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:52:39 -0400
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
References: <x7d4neg555c.fsf@equal-rites.mit.edu> <4969FAFD-094B-4774-B3B9-9B611FBF821A@kth.se> <518944F0.8050504@mit.edu> <51894A24.7000507@mit.edu> <tslli7pmq25.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslli7pmq25.fsf@mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmplleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IR4hRV1j1V0hVocGy2gMXXtgdsFkc3r2Jx YPJYsuQnk8fKqafZA5iiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDI2ty5mLljJVDFp222WBsZPjF2MnBwSAiYS vxfPZoewxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEksI9R4sXza8wQzgZGibUntjFBOIeZJFbPn8UE0sIroCbxffcO sFEsAqoSFxshxrIJKEscPPuNBcQWFQiROP25iRmiXlDi5MwnYHERASWJG4f/g9UzCwhLXNi+ l7WLkYNDWMBG4sOURIhd6xklFiy7CNbLCbRr8/1TrBCnSkosmtbJAtGrI/Gu7wEzhC0vsf3t HOYJjEKzkKybhaRsFpKyBYzMqxhlU3KrdHMTM3OKU5N1i5MT8/JSi3RN9XIzS/RSU0o3MYJC m91FaQfjz4NKhxgFOBiVeHgzErsChVgTy4orcw8xSnIwKYny6ucDhfiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNS iw8xSnAwK4nw3ksByvGmJFZWpRblw6SkOViUxHmvpdz0FxJITyxJzU5NLUgtgsnKcHAoSfBW FQM1ChalpqdWpGXmlCCkmTg4QYbzAA1vBKnhLS5IzC3OTIfIn2JUlBLnnQmSEABJZJTmwfXC Us8rRnGgV4R5O0GqeIBpC677FdBgJqDBCXztIINLEhFSUg2M/gtfHRPK/PZYRZ5H6YdJ8cW/ r7UUrPx26KQwbtp6y2ziCaZDfwWefbXdc/DjbKuP+TZN+dmaYZ7fj8/ufbpAWidN9PAxpo+u nr4bwjbuO1vi99mdM+DiRpuVxqptJ1WND75wnMX+cO90m0DnN14v/nswHDIoX5RXduJB+5Pv PIFez1WfGhv8V2Ipzkg01GIuKk4EAID/uSUYAwAA
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 15:52:55 -0000

On 05/08/2013 11:47 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Greg, presumably MIt would need to send unframed messages if it gets an
> unframed acceptor message as well.

No, this is unnecessary.  Our implementation will happily process framed
messages for all context tokens.  (Verified experimentally.)