IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> Tue, 07 May 2013 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ghudson@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E147A21F90D2 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qt0NPpUVWuw3 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-2.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5281E21F901F for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190d-b7f716d000005557-de-518944f3d601
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 8D.89.21847.3F449815; Tue, 7 May 2013 14:16:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r47IGIcP020508; Tue, 7 May 2013 14:16:18 -0400
Received: from [18.189.54.192] ([18.189.54.192]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as ghudson@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r47IGGZq024243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 7 May 2013 14:16:17 -0400
Message-ID: <518944F0.8050504@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:16:16 -0400
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
References: <x7d4neg555c.fsf@equal-rites.mit.edu> <4969FAFD-094B-4774-B3B9-9B611FBF821A@kth.se>
In-Reply-To: <4969FAFD-094B-4774-B3B9-9B611FBF821A@kth.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpmleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IR4hRV1v3s0hlosLdD1OLo5lUsFhfOqjow eSxZ8pPJo/v1RsYApigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujMWdDSwFNxkrXjw4xtzAuJKxi5GTQ0LARKJv wwU2CFtM4sK99UA2F4eQwD5GiQnPNrNDOBsYJT6evcYI4axhkjjx7Tc7SAuvgJrEul93wGwW AVWJ11Pms4DYbALKEgfPfgOzRQVCJE5/bmKGqBeUODnzCVhcRMBG4vO3RUwgNrOAtcTRD/eA ajg4hIHiH6YkgoSFBOIl9tw9AXYdp4CVxJ8dU5ggLpWUWDStkwWiVUfiXd8DZghbXqJ562zm CYxCs5Bsm4WkbBaSsgWMzKsYZVNyq3RzEzNzilOTdYuTE/PyUot0jfRyM0v0UlNKNzGCw1qS dwfju4NKhxgFOBiVeHgfcHQGCrEmlhVX5h5ilORgUhLl/WoEFOJLyk+pzEgszogvKs1JLT7E KMHBrCTCK6QAlONNSaysSi3Kh0lJc7AoifNeSbnpLySQnliSmp2aWpBaBJOV4eBQkuBd7wzU KFiUmp5akZaZU4KQZuLgBBnOAzT8LkgNb3FBYm5xZjpE/hSjopQ47xGQhABIIqM0D64XlnZe MYoDvSLM+wCkigeYsuC6XwENZgIanMDXDjK4JBEhJdXAqFO0Ksla+vYF3pTr7T3zU1RZGNPa H/9e2LbQ6I0IC3u3E0NAiVycu8ixz8vL2rtD9V6tZY94WDvjTKdkqlmoq5PtVbOOL0/+P76Y M+tfMfvxzQK2k1JW2sjtaN28U+zyxyObipt+lC/OOtdgfcZl2c1FU9iszzYaCzeGbOo+0M/U 8cwn6uB9JZbijERDLeai4kQAuSbiJhYDAAA=
Cc: "<kitten@ietf.org> <kitten@ietf.org>" <kitten@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Options for IAKERB compatibility issue
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 18:16:27 -0000

On 05/07/2013 02:02 PM, Love Hörnquist Åstrand wrote:
> 2 is not an option, its 5 or 1. prefer 1. doubtless after doing interop
> testing we'll find more issues.

Can you please explain your objection to #3?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email