IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call was Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-krb5-gssapi-prf-03.txt

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> Fri, 03 June 2005 21:41 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DeJuw-0002HE-6k; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:41:26 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DeJuu-0002H2-4O for kitten@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:41:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16965 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:41:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nwkea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.42.13]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DeKF9-0002IB-5P for kitten@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:02:21 -0400
Received: from centralmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM ([129.147.62.1]) by nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j53LfEKg001484 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104]) by centralmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id j53LfD6v024206 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:41:14 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j53LfDP7002479; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:41:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from nw141292@localhost) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id j53LfCp4002478; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:41:12 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:41:12 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20050603214112.GV27456@binky.Central.Sun.COM>
Mail-Followup-To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu>, kitten@ietf.org
References: <7210B31550AC934A8637D6619739CE690534F6FB@e2k-sea-xch2.sea-alpha.cisco.com> <429493A6.2040708@columbia.edu> <tslhdgh95wg.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <tslhdgh95wg.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Consensus call was Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-krb5-gssapi-prf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: kitten@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kitten-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: kitten-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Sam> I'm willing to live with this text although it's not great.  I
Sam> don't have improvements to offer.  The spirit behind the text is
Sam> fine.

How about pointing out that the lack of useful APIs for inquiring about
cryptographic QoPs or specification of policies on the same means that
pplications that need to make more than nominal use of
GSS_Pseudo_random() should take extra care?

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email