IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-krb5-gssapi-prf-03.txt

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> Tue, 24 May 2005 17:27 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DadBy-0007Xe-PY; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:27:46 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DadBw-0007XZ-U4 for kitten@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:27:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA20993 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:27:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DadU9-0004e1-Sl for kitten@ietf.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:46:35 -0400
Received: from centralmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM ([129.147.62.1]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4OHRg0R015500 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 11:27:42 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104]) by centralmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id j4OHRgEN028327 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 11:27:42 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4OHReWN028697; Tue, 24 May 2005 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from nw141292@localhost) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id j4OHRd3T028696; Tue, 24 May 2005 12:27:39 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 12:27:39 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20050524172739.GL27936@binky.Central.Sun.COM>
Mail-Followup-To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, "Blumenthal, Uri" <uri.blumenthal@intel.com>, kitten@ietf.org
References: <3DEC199BD7489643817ECA151F7C5929012AA5E9@pysmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> <20050523172407.GB27516@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <tslfywdh6yd.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <tslfywdh6yd.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-krb5-gssapi-prf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: kitten@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kitten-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: kitten-bounces@lists.ietf.org

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:13:14PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> writes:
> 
>     Nicolas> This is a consideration for mechanisms as much as for
>     Nicolas> applications.
> 
>     Nicolas> Mechanisms should not allow the PRF to output more than
>     Nicolas> is safe.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure that this is true.  I think it is a system level concern
> and like Uri's original text.

I'm losing track.

Can we some sense of whether this is ready for WG Last Call?

We seem to be arguing about security considerations only, rather than
over any technical details.

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email