IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> Wed, 30 July 2014 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF621A0180 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7DhNrkK9Q5Y for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACB21A01AC for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074422-f79be6d000007518-cf-53d908f55700
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id BC.17.29976.5F809D35; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:02:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s6UF2C8x008228; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:02:13 -0400
Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s6UF2AjM018442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:02:11 -0400
Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id s6UF29x4023605; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:02:09 -0400
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1406720770.3242.7.camel@willson.usersys.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1407301100190.21571@multics.mit.edu>
References: <tslwqax1mhm.fsf@mit.edu> <53D7DBE2.3010105@mit.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1407292114140.21571@multics.mit.edu> <1406720770.3242.7.camel@willson.usersys.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrPuV42awQXO/isXRzatYLH7MXcTq wOSxZMlPJo/3+66yBTBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGXc71nHXDCfpaL56GT2Bsa1zF2MnBwSAiYS e/b/ZISwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkMJtJ4sC7+0wQzkZGiesbZrFCOIeYJL5uuc4O0iIk0MAosf6c JojNIqAtse/wJxYQm01ARWLmm41sILaIgILEgv47YHFmAWGg8hlgq4UFbCTe7J7PCmJzCjhK fJ54EszmBbJnLT0ItXkNo8SDjQvBlokK6Eis3j+FBaJIUOLkzCdQQy0lzv25zjaBUXAWktQs JKkFjEyrGGVTcqt0cxMzc4pTk3WLkxPz8lKLdE31cjNL9FJTSjcxgoKV3UVpB+PPg0qHGAU4 GJV4eGf8vx4sxJpYVlyZe4hRkoNJSZT3390bwUJ8SfkplRmJxRnxRaU5qcWHGCU4mJVEeJex 3wwW4k1JrKxKLcqHSUlzsCiJ8761tgoWEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CycpwcChJ8P4GaRQsSk1PrUjL zClBSDNxcIIM5wEazsoBMry4IDG3ODMdIn+KUZdj0f6X3UxCLHn5ealS4rzf2YCKBECKMkrz 4ObAkswrRnGgt4R5r4Gs4wEmKLhJr4CWMAEteX7rOsiSkkSElFQDo8n5JWmzF11wWiyXXK7y hkn5brqJtfYduaCuqT3/z6QvCZxXH6GQ05d83nBNQbudav8xyTSL6IefMv+ccDC1Csm/8FRN ctGMO59X/n0rp9sj8taRc+nBdbNbNvtMWf/ul0ubw/5u0UyGVZO5551bNNWfLenylL/9u16X 5P9ed926u6y4JenPdSWW4oxEQy3mouJEADLWh70NAwAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/fWIKI_uNO8iRK8Uzv2chv-GQLUs
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:02:25 -0000

On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:

> I thought we concluded that CAMMAC does not need to be wrapped in
> AD-IF-RELEVANT because it has the same properties by definition and
> therefore is always non critical as well, but I would not mind
> specifying it has to be wrapped in AD-IF-RELEVANT for best
> compatibility.

I had some memories of coming to this conclusion as well, but don't see 
anything in the list archive or meeting minutes.  Maybe it was from 
discussion on one of the krb5 development conference calls.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email