IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Sat, 02 August 2014 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1428A1A0387 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpzOeWFiPdyW for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C291E1A0381 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910DC2007F10B; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=qh5FmV66xBdk/o 1nJDs6pBrc49A=; b=gUd3TsVz3ZaaSv9PHwI5TL3Ja35HO+94rBQ9zQxi3NBm9w N6Fl/xNJem2IkjyRyO1B8S5o+MtBUjG8NDr//vQjg/9IfuFRdsTXlkkgdL59giaC s5uwelyCeUMrKXITwXekms4NhC2BCEctXpboSvkD+uLitQIaOuDKOSnlbFJCQ=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 419E62007F109; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:29:51 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
Message-ID: <20140802032949.GD3579@localhost>
References: <tslwqax1mhm.fsf@mit.edu> <53D7DBE2.3010105@mit.edu> <ldvfvhgrvzl.fsf@sarnath.mit.edu> <CAK3OfOj=HvzinngO0Gj8kJeV=NGrv2pMvO_PBUPX9moQ4t4nzg@mail.gmail.com> <tslha1whwvn.fsf@mit.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1408012251230.21571@multics.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1408012251230.21571@multics.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/zilcQk282JW9WMOFq5Gf_axqefI
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 03:29:54 -0000

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:53:08PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> I'm glad to see lots of people chiming in with agreement, but are we
> all clear on what we're agreeing to?
> 
> Are we accepting Greg's reading of 4120 section 5.2.6.2, "This
> element and the elements it encapsulates MAY safely be ignored by
> applications, application servers, and KDCs that do not implement
> this element."

Oh, hmmm.  Will anyone ever want to include critical elements in a
CAMMAC?  If so then CAMMAC would need a way to signal that, or it'd have
to be permitted to be critical itself.

Maybe it really is time to revisit criticality...  Maybe we just can't
get it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email