IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Fri, 01 August 2014 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639761A0303 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oNq0Rvr5Ejuq for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F921B289F for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DBC20179; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:45:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id niU90LAMWBat; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:45:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [10.1.10.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:45:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id D941381B18; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:45:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
References: <tslwqax1mhm.fsf@mit.edu> <53D7DBE2.3010105@mit.edu> <ldvfvhgrvzl.fsf@sarnath.mit.edu> <CAK3OfOj=HvzinngO0Gj8kJeV=NGrv2pMvO_PBUPX9moQ4t4nzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 14:45:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOj=HvzinngO0Gj8kJeV=NGrv2pMvO_PBUPX9moQ4t4nzg@mail.gmail.com> (Nico Williams's message of "Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:12:37 -0500")
Message-ID: <tslha1whwvn.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/ox8DUlPjm5MN62AfI2IZRb3TdRw
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:45:51 -0000

>>>>> "Nico" == Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> writes:

    Nico> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu> wrote:
    >> I agree that AD-CAMMAC should have the same effect on the
    >> criticality of its contents as AD-KDC-ISSUED.  We can recommend
    >> that a CAMMAC be put in AD-IF-RELEVANT if it is likely that the
    >> consuming service won't understand it.  The KDC might have enough
    >> knowledge of the capabilities of the service that the extra layer
    >> of wrapping might not be necessary.

    Nico> I agree with this.

I'm fine with this too.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email