IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Review of draft-sorce-krbwg-general-pac-02

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 22 June 2011 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A48811E8153 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.619, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bM5cWfrqVuCy for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5BF11E8139 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5761C50; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:01:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E7333; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:01:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676942CC0B7; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:01:00 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D8380E91 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:00:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C5D7CC061; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:00:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07235-08; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:00:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E047CC05E for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:00:58 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmwDAFbmAU5FGcQcgWdsb2JhbABUEKcTAQEWJiW/F4h5hi0EoT9T
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,406,1304312400"; d="scan'208";a="62282182"
Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (HELO mail.suchdamage.org) ([69.25.196.28]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2011 08:00:58 -0500
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 708D02058F; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:56:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 2E1224307; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:00:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: "Cantor, Scott E." <cantor.2@osu.edu>
References: <CA262E7D.DCF2%cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:00:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CA262E7D.DCF2%cantor.2@osu.edu> (Scott E. Cantor's message of "Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:20:14 +0000")
Message-ID: <tslfwn2rpfc.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: "ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov" <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>, Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Review of draft-sorce-krbwg-general-pac-02
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

>>>>> "Cantor," == Cantor, Scott E <cantor.2@osu.edu> writes:

    Cantor,> On 6/21/11 8:44 AM, "Simo Sorce" <simo@redhat.com> wrote:
    >>> It is worth noting that the SAML Assertion element has the
    >>> semantics described in section 5.1 ("PAD Format"); consequently,
    >>> in principle a SAML attribute assertion could be used as the PAD
    >>> payload.
    >> 
    >> It could, but I didn't want to add SAML as a dependency for a
    >> KDC. ASN.1 while not fancy is available already in both the KDC
    >> and the Kerberos client libraries, so it seems a more common
    >> denominator.

    Cantor,> Perhaps somebody should simply define an ASN.1 encoding for
    Cantor,> SAML assertions.

    Cantor,> The encoding is unimportant. The semantics are where all
    Cantor,> the interesting code lives.
<hat role="individual">

I agree with Scott.  I don't care about the encoding.  However I do
believe this document should give explicit guidance for how PAD
attributes are surfaced through naming extensions.
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email