IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Review of draft-sorce-krbwg-general-pac-02

"Cantor, Scott E." <cantor.2@osu.edu> Wed, 22 June 2011 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2115411E8075 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.375, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vhw4DpPka2cx for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDDA11E80E2 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DCB1D; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:01:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADCA4B; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:01:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8E02CC0FD; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:01:44 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2C180E91 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:01:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650A07CC06B; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:01:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06859-06; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:01:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498347CC061 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:01:42 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwDALg+AU6AktgVe2dsb2JhbABUpwsUAQEWJgQaB78iiHmGKwShcg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,403,1304312400"; d="scan'208";a="62260501"
Received: from defang12.it.ohio-state.edu ([128.146.216.21]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2011 20:01:28 -0500
Received: from CIO-TNC-HT06.osuad.osu.edu (cio-tnc-ht06.osuad.osu.edu [164.107.81.171]) by defang12.it.ohio-state.edu (8.13.7/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5M11ESj024961; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:01:14 -0400
Received: from CIO-KRC-D1MBX01.osuad.osu.edu ([fe80::450b:35e6:80f4:f3e0]) by CIO-TNC-HT06.osuad.osu.edu ([fe80::dde8:9609:5365:c6f3%11]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:59:48 -0400
From: "Cantor, Scott E." <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "mrex@sap.com" <mrex@sap.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ietf-krb-wg] Review of draft-sorce-krbwg-general-pac-02
Thread-Index: AQHMMBDXxpNwazRfuUGGoPQt8s0XypTH7U4AgADJ2YD//9h4gA==
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:01:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CA26B699.C71F%cantor.2@osu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <201106212322.p5LNMfaR011533@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-ID: <717bd465-d8d4-44b6-a4de-27712b79c726>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=164.107.81.171; country=US; region=OH; city=Columbus; latitude=39.9968; longitude=-82.9882; metrocode=535; areacode=614; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=39.9968,-82.9882&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.21
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: "ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov" <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>, "simo@redhat.com" <simo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Review of draft-sorce-krbwg-general-pac-02
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

On 6/21/11 7:22 PM, "Martin Rex" <mrex@sap.com> wrote:

>Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
>> 
>> Perhaps somebody should simply define an ASN.1 encoding for SAML
>> assertions.
>
>Please DON'T!  In the end, everyone would have to implement
>both, making that part of the problem at least twice as bad,
>and one would have to constantly maintain/update a mappings spec.

Everyone is already forced to implement "both", the only question is
whether there's any commonality at the logical level.

"Both" isn't even accurate, since OAuth is reinventing the same stuff
already, with yet another encoding.

-- Scott

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email