Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Review of draft-sorce-krbwg-general-pac-02

Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> Tue, 21 June 2011 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B2A11E8083 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ZTDr5IId+eF for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0ED311E8075 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A9A4B; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573BB48; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EFB2CC0FD; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:54 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5127480E91 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D897CC064; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28990-09; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1187CC05C for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:51 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsgBAD0nAU6bOESMlGdsb2JhbABUEKZ2FAEBAQEJCwkJFAYfyQSGKgSRZo9QOA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,403,1304312400"; d="scan'208";a="62258163"
Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([155.56.68.140]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Jun 2011 18:22:51 -0500
Received: from mail.sap.corp by smtpde02.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id p5LNMgte017451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:22:42 +0200 (MEST)
From: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <201106212322.p5LNMfaR011533@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
To: cantor.2@osu.edu
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:22:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CA262E7D.DCF2%cantor.2@osu.edu> from "Cantor, Scott E." at Jun 21, 11 03:20:14 pm
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SAP: out
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov, simo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Review of draft-sorce-krbwg-general-pac-02
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
> 
> Perhaps somebody should simply define an ASN.1 encoding for SAML
> assertions.

Please DON'T!  In the end, everyone would have to implement
both, making that part of the problem at least twice as bad,
and one would have to constantly maintain/update a mappings spec.

This would only result in massive code bloat all over the place
and amplify inconsistencies between independent codebases.

-Martin
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg