RE: WG adoption call for EVPN Overlay draft

"UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com> Fri, 03 October 2014 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ju1738@att.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296141A02F7 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWFvBnk2e3-X for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B5A1A02C2 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) with ESMTP id d02ce245.2b347568e940.6504417.00-2436.18202273.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <ju1738@att.com>); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 542ec20d6053bafb-696c93c35b031762a980a73f675dc47f1c6502be
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id cf1ce245.0.6504234.00-2271.18201733.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <ju1738@att.com>); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:34:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 542ec1fc632a95cc-6abea94acf9ca98c58f883444f6ebfcacb3b825f
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93FYJRM022060; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:34:20 -0400
Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93FY9a8021869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:34:16 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.149]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:33:52 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.28]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:33:52 -0400
From: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
To: "'Ali Sajassi (sajassi)'" <sajassi@cisco.com>, 'Giles Heron' <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "'l2vpn@ietf.org'" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WG adoption call for EVPN Overlay draft
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for EVPN Overlay draft
Thread-Index: AQHP3weH9OoCC1xFtEG4gyAuXkVcyJwewlCA//+/PBA=
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:33:52 +0000
Message-ID: <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F06D90D95@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <DFEE5C63-7ED6-4DEE-AA2D-2082E711C085@gmail.com> <D0540C21.F2249%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0540C21.F2249%sajassi@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.207.211]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=eemKic4H c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=wQU-dWPKAmoA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9]
X-AnalysisOut: [zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUA]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=L0RZC5GDEZzoa-5zQc4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_]
X-AnalysisOut: [8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <ju1738@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/0HwK-YIdKhYBnTOKRzBwFy4C320
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:34:39 -0000

+1 

Jim Uttaro

-----Original Message-----
From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 11:28 AM
To: Giles Heron; l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG adoption call for EVPN Overlay draft


Support as a co-author.
This draft is the foundation for the NVO3 BGP-based solution using EVPN on
which other EVPN related drafts (for NOV3) rely.

-Ali

On 10/3/14, 5:42 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi WG,
>
>this email initiates a WG adoption call for:
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03
>
>the draft was well supported at the WG meeting in Toronto, but for the
>sake of record do feel free to send the usual flood of "Support!" emails
>(if nothing else to make the doc shepherd's job easier).  Of course it
>would be even more helpful if people could send substantive comments as
>to the suitability (or not) of this draft for adoption by the L2VPN WG so
>the authors/chairs actually have some feedback to work with.
>
>this poll will close on Friday October 17th.
>
>Giles