IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04

Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com> Thu, 18 December 2014 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tmmorin.orange@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CC51A89BB for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:19:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eyCIcJ0E5LXX for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:19:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC12B1A888F for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:19:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so1952285wiv.13 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:19:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NOTR5h1sEIUNT1JjzwJ72MQoKc5kFljf7DlXkk6wR24=; b=UydeIPHKjLfCMNuHrqmEVolCsRT8kDy4vpESn1KOACVjYATdr3+b+Rril1qwq2T/Ea 6SXU8nEESWn5KxxNwTbIdyk6aXaqTz0L0hrlhI8bSWCUxmaJ3YZCapWleE0PF00x8V1T x+AcgUV4jfIyiYKACP7HSed1RqLZApa9d49coGAgUh95vlIHAae8QP0uqKc9by9LDVoS MejFNDTDmcjdVOLyMJlYvTMdGO9mwx6D2g1xhUzwQ/blYtvGBEMsfI6iCgaOSxf+py2o l5/poEwhckREv3EBP8quoCTSkwYq0xLHN3IQZ4KtCTK3KqucznEbrXde8mB18GCkBpZ3 eP6A==
X-Received: by 10.180.96.97 with SMTP id dr1mr5479294wib.49.1418912358732; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ARennes-652-1-176-50.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr. [81.53.191.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ex8sm9096152wjd.41.2014.12.18.06.19.17 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Thomas Morin <tmmorin.orange@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5492E264.7080001@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:19:16 +0100
From: Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: l2vpn@ietf.org, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04
References: <DFEE5C63-7ED6-4DEE-AA2D-2082E711C085@gmail.com>, <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F356@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com>, <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F359@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA12486DC1E5@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA12486DC1E5@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/i8_2EgYxJKxeqVzdTPAlc77uYe8
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:19:22 -0000

Hi everyone,

Before formally adopting this in BESS, we need an answer from each 
co-author on this recurrent reminder question about existing knowledge 
of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been 
disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 
and 5378 for more details).

==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from 
each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please 
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Best,

-Thomas/Martin


Nabil:
> Hi,
> For the record, this call had closed on October 20. The draft has good
> support. The authors are to work with the BESS WG chairs to issue this draft as a BESS working group draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Nabil & Giles
> _____________________________
> From: Bitar, Nabil
> N
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:16 AM
> To: l2vpn@ietf.org
> Cc: Giles Heron;
> amclachl@cisco.com
> Subject: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS
> support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04
>
> L2VPN WG,
>
> This is the
> start of a 2-week call for adopting the draft ³VPWS support in E-VPN²,
> draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04, as an L2VPN WG document. The draft can be
> found at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04.txt
>
> This
> draft was well supported in the WG meeting in Toronto, but as always we are
> taking it to the list to decide on WG adoption. Please, reply to this email
> indicating your support or objection to adopting this draft as a WG
> document. Substantive comments in addition to indicating your support or
> objection are appreciated
>
> This call will close on Monday, October 20,
> 2014.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Nabil & Giles
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email