IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?

Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk> Sat, 17 September 2011 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88FC21F891D for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.522, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELrLwNl2mNwh for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me (mailex.mailcore.me [94.136.40.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D75921F8A4B for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpc10-cmbg15-2-0-cust121.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.30.246.122] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by mail5.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1R4sr3-0005qH-26; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:14:41 +0100
Subject: Re: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5E84490C-9456-4E33-B57B-6DEF29195A5B@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:14:40 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A93A8234-EFDD-408A-A7F1-A94818978F37@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
References: <5E84490C-9456-4E33-B57B-6DEF29195A5B@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailcore-Auth: 9600544
X-Mailcore-Domain: 172912
Cc: L3VPN WG mailing list <l3vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:12:26 -0000

Colleagues,

We have consesnus to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document, can the authors please re-submit it as draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00.

Thanks
Ben

On 30 Aug 2011, at 16:58, Ben Niven-Jenkins wrote:

> L3VPNers,
> 
> We have a milestone in our charter to "Submit S-PMSI A-D route Wildcard selection specification to IESG as PS".
> 
> Previously we had two individual drafts (draft-rekhter-mvpn-wildcard-spmsi & draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards) that addressed this topic. The authors of those drafts have now produced a single combined draft: draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00
> 
> This e-mail is to start a poll on whether the L3VPN WG should adopt the new combined draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document.
> 
> Please indicate your support or otherwise by responding to this message (with yes/support or no/do not support) or by e-mailing the WG chairs privately.
> 
> If you do not support the adoption of the document it would be useful if you could also state the reason for your objection.
> 
> Please send your responses by midnight 13th September PT.
> 
> Thanks
> Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email