RE: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?

Ray Qiu <ray.qiu@huawei.com> Tue, 30 August 2011 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ray.qiu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2974E21F8F4F for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSRHsrjvDYd1 for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AE421F8CC2 for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LQR00M9RCKB8A@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for l3vpn@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:21:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.18.4.104]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LQR00K30CKATK@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for l3vpn@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:21:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DFWEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.101) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:21:47 -0700
Received: from DFWEML504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.82]) by DFWEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::f07f:889f:78ef:8df3%13]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:21:46 -0700
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:21:45 +0000
From: Ray Qiu <ray.qiu@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?
In-reply-to: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D671A8F89C1@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.47.137.25]
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>, L3VPN WG mailing list <l3vpn@ietf.org>
Message-id: <593EDC4FAE925F46A2E63AFC4CEEFF7512FE9FEA@dfweml504-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US
Thread-topic: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?
Thread-index: AQHMZ0vR31SsJWYCwEixSHJcTLkVXZU10iTQ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <5E84490C-9456-4E33-B57B-6DEF29195A5B@niven-jenkins.co.uk> <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D671A8F89C1@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:20:50 -0000

Support

Thanks,
Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ben Niven-Jenkins
Sent: dinsdag 30 augustus 2011 17:58
To: L3VPN WG mailing list
Subject: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?

L3VPNers,

We have a milestone in our charter to "Submit S-PMSI A-D route Wildcard selection specification to IESG as PS".

Previously we had two individual drafts (draft-rekhter-mvpn-wildcard-spmsi & draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards) that addressed this topic. The authors of those drafts have now produced a single combined draft: draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00

This e-mail is to start a poll on whether the L3VPN WG should adopt the new combined draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document.

Please indicate your support or otherwise by responding to this message (with yes/support or no/do not support) or by e-mailing the WG chairs privately.

If you do not support the adoption of the document it would be useful if you could also state the reason for your objection.

Please send your responses by midnight 13th September PT.

Thanks
Ben