Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?

Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk> Tue, 30 August 2011 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB0A21F8CF4 for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MU4HaqjkjvFD for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me (mailex.mailcore.me [94.136.40.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E122F21F89BA for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host1.cachelogic.com ([212.44.43.80] helo=dhcp-112-devlan.cachelogic.com) by mail6.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1QyQhk-0007zw-Td for l3vpn@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:58:25 +0100
From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:58:27 +0100
Message-Id: <5E84490C-9456-4E33-B57B-6DEF29195A5B@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
To: L3VPN WG mailing list <l3vpn@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailcore-Auth: 9600544
X-Mailcore-Domain: 172912
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:03 -0000

L3VPNers,

We have a milestone in our charter to "Submit S-PMSI A-D route Wildcard selection specification to IESG as PS".

Previously we had two individual drafts (draft-rekhter-mvpn-wildcard-spmsi & draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards) that addressed this topic. The authors of those drafts have now produced a single combined draft: draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00

This e-mail is to start a poll on whether the L3VPN WG should adopt the new combined draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document.

Please indicate your support or otherwise by responding to this message (with yes/support or no/do not support) or by e-mailing the WG chairs privately.

If you do not support the adoption of the document it would be useful if you could also state the reason for your objection.

Please send your responses by midnight 13th September PT.

Thanks
Ben