IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?

"Muley, Praveen V (Praveen)" <praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 31 August 2011 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAEC21F8E60 for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46lWy5hyIsft for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BD721F8E56 for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p7VLi5WC000242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:44:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB02.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub02.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.111]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p7VLi4lj011695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:44:05 -0500
Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSC3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.145]) by USNAVSXCHHUB02.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.111]) with mapi; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:44:05 -0500
From: "Muley, Praveen V (Praveen)" <praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:44:03 -0500
Subject: RE: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?
Thread-Topic: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?
Thread-Index: AcxnTW6/lQPmdBdBRx+L8wekcoE75wA2ZQnw
Message-ID: <2073A6C5467C99478898544C6EBA3F4602BB5DD0DA@USNAVSXCHMBSC3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <5E84490C-9456-4E33-B57B-6DEF29195A5B@niven-jenkins.co.uk> <4E5D3DEB.2010508@raszuk.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E5D3DEB.2010508@raszuk.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Cc: L3VPN WG mailing list <l3vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:42:37 -0000

 

Support.

Thx.
Praveen

> L3VPNers,
> 
> We have a milestone in our charter to "Submit S-PMSI A-D route 
> Wildcard selection specification to IESG as PS".
> 
> Previously we had two individual drafts 
> (draft-rekhter-mvpn-wildcard-spmsi &
> draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards) that addressed this topic. The 
> authors of those drafts have now produced a single combined draft:
> draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00
> 
> This e-mail is to start a poll on whether the L3VPN WG should adopt 
> the new combined draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG 
> document.
> 
> Please indicate your support or otherwise by responding to this 
> message (with yes/support or no/do not support) or by e-mailing the WG 
> chairs privately.
> 
> If you do not support the adoption of the document it would be useful 
> if you could also state the reason for your objection.
> 
> Please send your responses by midnight 13th September PT.
> 
> Thanks Ben
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email