IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sat, 25 January 2020 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858AA12006B for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:23:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j20V6ltefcdx for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88BE012004E for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484QtP3Ndmz6GF2B; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:23:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1579933389; bh=yrsa9xpeDMaxMu755lTYd34vuA2PMZokpGbk5tvmyBA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Jfb1spq1v4m8Up3dxF43b2OoDzcJHMD3abHYVqUhnB39KomoMdkN3FLgw0CdWyyc9 tj4Fw+qaWhTpAPR75JndTLBhhTR4l1v6GDyu7ccDMpnFHU0bNV8iNoUw6q2R5x/FwE Xf6wyodfHvOIsUiiH+DTOsdDNa87Z37YMbikgPDk=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 484QtN6BMQz6GF0f; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:23:08 -0800 (PST)
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, last-call@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6Sy5-ejdjw5zgZgiF1hSyuiAErmas-dbWFmx1b+1vftT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOMVYpEYaEUzYsa0ApDfGtA6oD5P67A40=HQVBN+yTuKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz7vihWaoeG8H11JzQ5YqrbYLPLneuY3PD4syMYEaKQ4w@mail.gmail.com> <99d34ee9-8ea6-a77f-39fc-f1889a050358@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwHd2=Qf2SSbQeKs1CS_c1UuBqPEtO_x4MmF71iv0zE9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMdonehuZ3re4UnGY2_B6A2sOBqkoE+m4SfBa8N3vYEhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw1LSXj=L2WAu=R1QfBi4UFDXC5Z6EODqwJ6-z9o5Z5vw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPBhGZDxnh2p=trL8yHveBiMsy38+-G_7oQu_eR+45d5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SyNTsz9uZNiN16OHLj6e=Xhcn1A8pr105Of+y_Jw8HSFw@mail.gmail.com> <994c4462-ef24-6d46-3bec-8aa5e14b9f78@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6Sy80-74g4cgKESwmdn3WSNjU_2XsjkChH9_8-ELnytC_Q@mail.gmail.com> <7829860d-7f8e-8c6b-e2c2-189e0946e35e@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwkV05Qe_Wk0mV6_tuPrc4w-YL3wJ4ee1DTemTUWOezeg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <1d310bb5-f219-1c83-e3ec-d00741e62cc6@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 01:23:06 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SwkV05Qe_Wk0mV6_tuPrc4w-YL3wJ4ee1DTemTUWOezeg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/fS43qqcnoVp-NnAzfm_DtGEynFI>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 06:23:11 -0000

I have no idea what you are asking for.
The existing rules permit certain behavior which, if the community 
approves this document, will now be prohibited.  that is all it does. 
There are very few if any examples of documents that were permitted but 
would now be prohibited.

At this point, I will leave it to the document shepherd and AD to tell 
me if there is something more needed.

Yours,
Joel

On 1/25/2020 1:12 AM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:48 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com 
> <mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com>> wrote:
> 
>     You seem to be looking for some categorization other than what the
>     document says.  I am unclear why.
> 
> 
> I asked for some example documents. Could you provide some?
> 
> 
>     The document states clearly that it applies to all Informational and
>     Experimental documents on the IETF stream. 
> 
> 
> Yes, but not what happens next. Which leaves it incomplete.
> 
> thanks,
> Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email