IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 25 January 2020 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8DE12001E for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:24:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 340ApMKC9Okn for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x141.google.com (mail-il1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFDD12004C for <last-call@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x141.google.com with SMTP id s18so4060656iln.0 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:24:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sBupbW7oz7IyEy/iBPxQ3hIRl3QFyl59sXafHA49t5U=; b=iSb8lt498UQJkYf6IepUlrXZgRSamQlApMFvn0Eta+2BIGbwTtSD9fWidoLiwRtCmB zXh717RrMBrhQQqdmag3L8UzMc6gRQO7kye9//ivVNRCKGDI7+RyfqvccxSDhPZtL0p/ TUf7Cx8KkEhunzq8iyiMcqPkLhlzukuMnmV0IgixueIRgtk9vAH1ZLr+N+QVkFdU5Qud 0ticV/0ALeXwqUTnyjDaojd/gg73urZ34zBd7QXTMRg5MK0t32AzV50Wxy43TGMQrwB5 JCegYthsujVj2fn8S3kgf6hSPN4mCgWAZWLBt8+oHBAxlpgA1G0YOCreJ6NQQW1pKInY EFPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sBupbW7oz7IyEy/iBPxQ3hIRl3QFyl59sXafHA49t5U=; b=YpjKpwQhnukMw3rjN6x7micxk6O0EskHu9J4fBTuV9snXujKUDTFxU7WoPFjCWAr6Z 2PY3yqL9TVeIz7oYcZk+F/w4/aM0GEXpxjq+uOQl8SamTbbQS9lhzP13z2PLDSdfjQfU 1S+YjWstsaRhs0ji/hXxLpTCEnZX50pR8XkFNTc/M1dDJqWJzLQDBJlAi0TIeYFponf9 CuqkwzkSLgVNpyRACNHvjGg4IEnOJ9mmler155DsCCNSg+dduSG8P6FZOqjiDwcl0C3M Qcf7JBsW9hRLPDNzuaKM56O3gXgxj/LTuogTwaEV4fAi7XzhXizfKHYX/3aSuuOzY3EX 1wug==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX1srHmQt99ScJhoIQRyP6zPTr352xO1VvrTOHEZVQaDpL8ROBX 3G8ZKP2PN/e2R0PwIa+vc9/gDe3KA0V3142zLUI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDqI03/poNxmUKpGtoIoadzceO/D40LkypYrPXpurUNqza8fuuRHjW/oBJnOG9pr9VqQmtXELT+mDgrC3OoGk=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8307:: with SMTP id f7mr8986079ild.73.1579983886851; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:24:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBOMVYpEYaEUzYsa0ApDfGtA6oD5P67A40=HQVBN+yTuKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz7vihWaoeG8H11JzQ5YqrbYLPLneuY3PD4syMYEaKQ4w@mail.gmail.com> <99d34ee9-8ea6-a77f-39fc-f1889a050358@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwHd2=Qf2SSbQeKs1CS_c1UuBqPEtO_x4MmF71iv0zE9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMdonehuZ3re4UnGY2_B6A2sOBqkoE+m4SfBa8N3vYEhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw1LSXj=L2WAu=R1QfBi4UFDXC5Z6EODqwJ6-z9o5Z5vw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPBhGZDxnh2p=trL8yHveBiMsy38+-G_7oQu_eR+45d5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SyNTsz9uZNiN16OHLj6e=Xhcn1A8pr105Of+y_Jw8HSFw@mail.gmail.com> <994c4462-ef24-6d46-3bec-8aa5e14b9f78@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6Sy80-74g4cgKESwmdn3WSNjU_2XsjkChH9_8-ELnytC_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200125184550.GF77560@kduck.mit.edu> <CAChr6SzXFPbcPL++gftey9T_nCVBds+Sb1Z4MpkC2GraZCNfKw@mail.gmail.com> <c220d99f-d69a-ede0-630b-2f593412daca@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <c220d99f-d69a-ede0-630b-2f593412daca@joelhalpern.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:24:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sy9=1Gewkq-E=+d9sLFrGS0kL33RUNLxvs44tX0czoUCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, last-call@ietf.org, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000053a542059cfcaa7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/i4oYv80vnjg48kC4FfIpydwIdTk>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:24:49 -0000

On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 12:10 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
wrote:

> Rob, I can see no reason why this document would change what is or is
> not considered an end-run.
>

OK. I think the document should cite RFC 5742 in its description of the
other streams. Given your statement, I propose this edit:

   One could argue that there is a need for publishing some documents
   that the community can not agree on.  However, we have an explicit
   procedure for such publication, namely the Independent Stream.  Or,
   for research documents, the IRTF stream, which explicitly publishes
   many minority opinion Informational RFCs. RFC 5742 describes the
   IESG procedures for the handling of those streams, and this document
   introduces no new requirements to those procedures.

Editorial nits:

- The capitalization of "Stream" is inconsistent.
- typo: "the IAB SHOULD use its authorithy"

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email