Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice

"Christopher Wood" <caw@heapingbits.net> Sun, 26 January 2020 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B24E120071 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:10:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=T/590dj2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Lrai5sIH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id caThrZ55ZkLC for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58DF120043 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8614A2151C for <last-call@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:09:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:09:57 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=azEvfehnWbg7OGoJjmEFLnBj4m+VshN d5vQUUvIJLiM=; b=T/590dj2nAL69Z7J80U+LSHD/ZvxLj8tfNnCrPvh69GtHya RcClqv0Ik3UYVy/+3fW8kDUldzNRJUnFf4gGm2NkbrYsqqkrVmsNcgY5pH48wIXi 2/B69bsRD+NT0ccUydYiy4s0FahYGTtpUHfsDw56ZMtOoyBZhV712sKCKVXtPvQy 6JpoPpRpPWOnexx2nOFAbgs+rw/q9WWZCicrNOna2w7RfI059F/P91sxcvp8sXqO X2JMM22yd2rrdSoE054aLCcfhUJyMzZCe2lsEtM6xIv7gETSb3ka8i7x07mmbPyK G8og4xB9lNcCs/VlZ1m6C7Bdioj1J7kMbkru/qw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=azEvfe hnWbg7OGoJjmEFLnBj4m+VshNd5vQUUvIJLiM=; b=Lrai5sIHqDN4IMEgAZ8IYB mEpgMBqYC70dc2SCy4hi8U+CWl5P22TQ/j8rBrwj8C3ZISBNHrH57aS7lItSyOTE jLD1tNNNtt64snkixOIzrb6PZbTkDmzMFnYKazF/4oinQxRkfSMHESyyabL0zTx5 0tnLzXFjmCxm8iqa5dYura8xu6qJEpz61iVe5kAx7fCQPxrsXRmVwPIapGaUHwbN PYKz9Yg8dhmTs+s2Wq70OWOyuDTIOdviUSmCfsKXehWRue0WvLwbQUnj0GwE037C XU998c+HnnNU3ThlrjxjhVLPgMOjkDacCWow6lA8vpTrRntZU3OvrdKcXBOlanUA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:FfItXr8r7Nbb8Q9xWlhpOXUkzDLAZ5mYVxhg4jRtEIljDml_sccaJQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrfedtgddufeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvrhcuhghoohgufdcuoegtrgif sehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvghtqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:FfItXk6RKL4fWIaCXr0XYpsKjqSPIhBoP3Hthfw22Ky2NMdeR3aplw> <xmx:FfItXthqcfnra9WdIjyFnn25efX2qgCftdkTTE6Cf6KMUu_l5o7Mhw> <xmx:FfItXjqVMQAILEwg3Sv5Wrly56zQmLgnE_Q3mG_6dC6pb3y2bW9T3Q> <xmx:FfItXnXtWGb487sba-XHXp2PyNQNoZA0DzROXanP2MoRNLg-kYLr5w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1A5283C00A1; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:09:57 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-777-gdb93371-fmstable-20200123v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <238b2086-80cb-4227-947e-aa7bd565e79e@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b6b6bc7a-998b-4cd7-3684-18df02c6a537@joelhalpern.com>
References: <CABcZeBOMVYpEYaEUzYsa0ApDfGtA6oD5P67A40=HQVBN+yTuKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz7vihWaoeG8H11JzQ5YqrbYLPLneuY3PD4syMYEaKQ4w@mail.gmail.com> <99d34ee9-8ea6-a77f-39fc-f1889a050358@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwHd2=Qf2SSbQeKs1CS_c1UuBqPEtO_x4MmF71iv0zE9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMdonehuZ3re4UnGY2_B6A2sOBqkoE+m4SfBa8N3vYEhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw1LSXj=L2WAu=R1QfBi4UFDXC5Z6EODqwJ6-z9o5Z5vw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPBhGZDxnh2p=trL8yHveBiMsy38+-G_7oQu_eR+45d5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SyNTsz9uZNiN16OHLj6e=Xhcn1A8pr105Of+y_Jw8HSFw@mail.gmail.com> <994c4462-ef24-6d46-3bec-8aa5e14b9f78@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6Sy80-74g4cgKESwmdn3WSNjU_2XsjkChH9_8-ELnytC_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200125184550.GF77560@kduck.mit.edu> <CAChr6SzXFPbcPL++gftey9T_nCVBds+Sb1Z4MpkC2GraZCNfKw@mail.gmail.com> <c220d99f-d69a-ede0-630b-2f593412daca@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6Sy9=1Gewkq-E=+d9sLFrGS0kL33RUNLxvs44tX0czoUCg@mail.gmail.com> <b6b6bc7a-998b-4cd7-3684-18df02c6a537@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:09:36 -0800
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/xrKSSiMRtCqlGrAe96ZvixRIH2k>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 20:10:02 -0000

On Sat, Jan 25, 2020, at 12:30 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> With regard to citing RFC 5742, I will leave it to the judgment of the 
> document shepherd and AD as to whether they believe that is called for. 
> It seems more distracting than useful to me, but I will act as they direct.

For the reason above, I do not think citing RFC 5742 is necessary.

> With regard to the Stream typo, that is noted, and will be corrected.
> 
> With regard to the "authority" typo, I will correct it, although that 
> paragraph will be removed before this becomes an RFC.

Thanks, Joel!

Best,
Chris