IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Fri, 12 June 2020 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F5F3A0FBC for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 05:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EwTfjKFyEFy3 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 05:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f52.google.com (mail-ot1-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C2FD3A0FC1 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 05:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 97so7261317otg.3 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 05:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=tDntGEKf3j8S9kl3SR6L/xs1+v3LtkVEK0bCRdzwltU=; b=t5yw67krP3NfsLmMUgccBAevUKdNrW8cApVrOjFeV8OMz3qaHRO7EcymtlEsRYnBJj xZUx/UEt4/slBB/57EsfqsTQY4/KSYku7X6SSIiAHF/3j+9yp8zPqOg34+j8JiSC5VZP JqlsLS+Y60xsikzNqNA5G1umtYt5Er5EQ1zQeplmpYstqdNA+GW7x2RHI8cAu5/dvdJp VW2ITfMJ/Zdy5dsEXInct8PubDnrX38CCI6iAXaUKwQX9gDeLVURoLt1r3sxYWv0jAkA 7iJfhYMcRakXIGzia8PneMAnUEMYmn/92fKJLsi6rZNGjF3+4ZrRZqO2jdJ8pH4b0ymn Duqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qcjNMa1DKNC+ggLK5VFWseP4zFXiFi1t7rpKInHhSHzKIe2+I LVCQfzEoVR4TmKlb+5IBlegtIQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8RW+pGfU9I5dBFid3FroxNc1q4O9Glw0+KXe7zGDKsRlHjvrHd3qh2iHIt4WzVDtdZR2qKg==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:aaa:: with SMTP id 39mr10144048otq.269.1591966771578; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 05:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.244] ([2600:1700:b380:3f00:45e2:3047:889f:766b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y68sm1343591oia.37.2020.06.12.05.59.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 05:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 08:59:28 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <4D84E94A-7535-4090-BE39-FB2ED242C9CA@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB53401B7092F57A088CED3552A2810@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <158981133458.2481.15195759097492819350@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB7PR07MB53406A74483D8123C75ADD70A28E0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5ECFE791.3050400@btconnect.com> <055C1A6F-3EA9-4695-869F-BDE0A4943BE5@icsi.berkeley.edu> <5ED0F22E.1070402@btconnect.com> <7CD0EF44-D26A-4F85-AA6A-91D3C55B44AC@icir.org> <5ED244F7.7030307@btconnect.com> <9AF1F719-7F29-4080-99E8-C0AB83DF1FF9@icir.org> <1UWAyt4aeg.1UCdKrbr8wj@pc8xp> <7534662C-6B13-4788-BD1F-F89B404C1088@icir.org> <DB7PR07MB5340CD431F596B63A812A360A2850@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAM4esxR_2x-kfwx3Ko_B+BKKEzMRBLTVBosvFpdyv2ZuVh1XNA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53401B7092F57A088CED3552A2810@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_CE6BAB3A-4A82-4E9C-991C-E3C068E0C3B2_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/hx4ChXVy5oBd9hne8ZMi7H_O5Kc>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:59:44 -0000

> Terminology the boiler plate is out of date

???

> s,2
> This document is different from from ...

fixed

> Requirements
> would be easier to refer to if they were R1, R2a or some such

i didn't make a change here; editorial discretion, i guess

> a reference for DNS recursive resolver would be good

fixed

> EWMA needs  expanding on first use

fixed

i can push these to a new version whenever.  i'll wait to hear
stewart's response to martin before doing so, however.

thanks,
allman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email