IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Fri, 12 June 2020 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E590C3A1163 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXyUgvYnJjVR for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-f174.google.com (mail-oi1-f174.google.com [209.85.167.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26EC3A1159 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-f174.google.com with SMTP id j189so9388414oih.10 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=AlDq3De8O2B2Z8U6WSppAltt7TcSGwt9UHDV/LFiClA=; b=p3aDwQiN1IWLqJTIRHMwQt1jUOkmb748q0pxn1mBb0/+K175MmgK4blNeCNtJE9keq 7nJQvX4R3+uFQ5W1YzfyRKlhFpT/SjfgfmN+4GeZSfRLTfgwkNO/GGYh2PN7DfUf8cNF wLptNZsb48Eh1tovqkBOS0lNkJob6SviFK9J5i31mSOKw/7OGyYMEj9bapMuwnSbvF5H J69H5wmrQi/D6GWkzdOlriMYl7yoe/nBw981ehJrKVE2Z7MepKRtcKOdy2qiqELneMsy moqSyk4KwK6hvwnTDvePvrh62eekgVsOPSP5aGuGJYXNyYxqYRLc/uDhjU1DZK0e3FfJ xZJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wqGrQ4WlNbjNXAU3q6LgfeL+BBeu6R3fSIwNO5ca2caOvpWP4 T24bFWUSJLHWH4lEnGcz4Jw8Ro/a7WM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgADot63Ms0V0G620BmB9Ve/2BiNJiubev5Lq8j/G3G6bq89y/sdoKhjn1lEaOge/M9mGL0w==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:470d:: with SMTP id u13mr13133oia.157.1591983604052; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.244] ([2600:1700:b380:3f00:45e2:3047:889f:766b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l20sm1481138otp.35.2020.06.12.10.40.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider@ietf.org, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:40:00 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <31294BB6-351B-4C6A-8B9F-9F2C0F81BD08@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <5EE3A35B.6000108@btconnect.com>
References: <158981133458.2481.15195759097492819350@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB7PR07MB53406A74483D8123C75ADD70A28E0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5ECFE791.3050400@btconnect.com> <055C1A6F-3EA9-4695-869F-BDE0A4943BE5@icsi.berkeley.edu> <5ED0F22E.1070402@btconnect.com> <7CD0EF44-D26A-4F85-AA6A-91D3C55B44AC@icir.org> <5ED244F7.7030307@btconnect.com> <9AF1F719-7F29-4080-99E8-C0AB83DF1FF9@icir.org> <1UWAyt4aeg.1UCdKrbr8wj@pc8xp> <7534662C-6B13-4788-BD1F-F89B404C1088@icir.org> <DB7PR07MB5340CD431F596B63A812A360A2850@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAM4esxR_2x-kfwx3Ko_B+BKKEzMRBLTVBosvFpdyv2ZuVh1XNA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53401B7092F57A088CED3552A2810@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <4D84E94A-7535-4090-BE39-FB2ED242C9CA@icir.org> <5EE3A35B.6000108@btconnect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_14452FAA-D4ED-401E-9B7B-BFDA15FFE32F_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/xmnFSwwfN8U-y6T-u6rQm0TB1o0>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:40:09 -0000

(i was confused because i wouldn't call these 'terminology' or
'boilerplate' ... ugh ...)

> try  2140bis s.2 para 1

yeah, i guess i can add an additional cite to draft

> 793bis needs updating too

???

793 nor 793bis is cited, so nothing to update here

allman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email