IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 12 June 2020 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9733A05A4; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id psMyuxnvZjgO; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150DD3A0766; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.112] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49k7l41z7rzyWB; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:58:56 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <31294BB6-351B-4C6A-8B9F-9F2C0F81BD08@icir.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:58:55 +0200
Cc: t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 613677535.7776819-9ca6cc438644a9853727f4cd073ace2a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <53272B96-995D-4092-B671-4E507F41CC03@tzi.org>
References: <158981133458.2481.15195759097492819350@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB7PR07MB53406A74483D8123C75ADD70A28E0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5ECFE791.3050400@btconnect.com> <055C1A6F-3EA9-4695-869F-BDE0A4943BE5@icsi.berkeley.edu> <5ED0F22E.1070402@btconnect.com> <7CD0EF44-D26A-4F85-AA6A-91D3C55B44AC@icir.org> <5ED244F7.7030307@btconnect.com> <9AF1F719-7F29-4080-99E8-C0AB83DF1FF9@icir.org> <1UWAyt4aeg.1UCdKrbr8wj@pc8xp> <7534662C-6B13-4788-BD1F-F89B404C1088@icir.org> <DB7PR07MB5340CD431F596B63A812A360A2850@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAM4esxR_2x-kfwx3Ko_B+BKKEzMRBLTVBosvFpdyv2ZuVh1XNA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53401B7092F57A088CED3552A2810@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <4D84E94A-7535-4090-BE39-FB2ED242C9CA@icir.org> <5EE3A35B.6000108@btconnect.com> <31294BB6-351B-4C6A-8B9F-9F2C0F81BD08@icir.org>
To: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/uw3X2bCu5-_p0FqqCSE90_g7Ex4>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:59:04 -0000

On 2020-06-12, at 19:40, Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> (i was confused because i wouldn't call these 'terminology' or
> 'boilerplate' ... ugh ...)
> 
>> try  2140bis s.2 para 1
> 
> yeah, i guess i can add an additional cite to draft

The text you want to use is on page 3 of RFC 8174, which now is BCP 14 together with RFC 2119.

>> 793bis needs updating too
> 
> ???
> 
> 793 nor 793bis is cited, so nothing to update here

No, but 793bis also uses the old boilerplate (totally unrelated comment).

(Tom: When making comments to a draft, it helps to do those in a way that can be understood by the authors.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email