IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 25 January 2020 04:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5F4120241 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:25:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jf8dlgtqx5Ub for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B22B12011C for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:25:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id i11so4148969ioi.12 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:25:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2eKH/01ytHA6g9VvTrWSeYWUtyK13Dm2xjYzZOIwdxw=; b=sUMe6VB96jzP46p3OfBsPKvgRKjLF7NCb0dLnUutTJdRjn2Kp/c6ZIsjplj7UPysjE MIPbpG/2cBsUsiu+goplmpKfwbq8OtmbGQBVD9AKtgWtCxsY1XyV5ueovf3fJfUn/Xoe GwlQw+tbAuPF9HaGwa+eO/HHn/u3Tewku7S+FmADOKgINM+in9nUd7zV8ztSxFSPCX6v KUu3mZB08TTP2QjOBMcEh3HNrSnfBFysMKmX6Xxvb5QaPHUHZg5FO8LTsRbn66w8C30s 6zYcPw7Vi5vRGJb5abePxynu8j1WCHifO/4aoQkJthWioADDfB+Ug1j738CqKAOa/MfX gWKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2eKH/01ytHA6g9VvTrWSeYWUtyK13Dm2xjYzZOIwdxw=; b=Hp6uOjGI+zu+/NUzDHbBRJLRaThJns9VFvqHJNTDSSTuOJa3b/LogrUwbQ0zuam/8L uyJLVAXK3nrfeQUjZ4Xfa1nty8nNe0cNTeXoUlEAI715EvkImlgSoCw1CvScJQODlrc6 9E+0g2ITPytN+iEEL85I47iWMj5bXG87zTM5Ee94BMg4TXv3nu+b5LqkapKaYGfQw8SJ HyJoZfEVVSJo5GNcetc/RESdhvP4LxNMb5Ow67uoWcEJCA/IIyHE7gFoch4F/FPQgPhS YwR/BbzOndSwqnSC1IiLiEpyupCXN0UCfwcUNhpKCUbbV3OE7QR2/gqlN0pLb6WRVGHX C4SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxYnhLtzwLSvMkQnbT/DJ1faXfyvPmgMAJ8KlOQknUiykNYc9O oVf9RN0Ds6vOojU/+pAGH1sEtQKH20LdDQy5p08=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPPn3yE30dJKTaWrjx03Fc8Dp2hqPYW6bpWx4KGTRjt9H+A8fZxxCC3yPZSwEIurWr/4AZNlmJVne6curYJA4=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:3ece:: with SMTP id s197mr5156419jas.30.1579926343729; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:25:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sy5-ejdjw5zgZgiF1hSyuiAErmas-dbWFmx1b+1vftT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOMVYpEYaEUzYsa0ApDfGtA6oD5P67A40=HQVBN+yTuKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz7vihWaoeG8H11JzQ5YqrbYLPLneuY3PD4syMYEaKQ4w@mail.gmail.com> <99d34ee9-8ea6-a77f-39fc-f1889a050358@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwHd2=Qf2SSbQeKs1CS_c1UuBqPEtO_x4MmF71iv0zE9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMdonehuZ3re4UnGY2_B6A2sOBqkoE+m4SfBa8N3vYEhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw1LSXj=L2WAu=R1QfBi4UFDXC5Z6EODqwJ6-z9o5Z5vw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPBhGZDxnh2p=trL8yHveBiMsy38+-G_7oQu_eR+45d5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SyNTsz9uZNiN16OHLj6e=Xhcn1A8pr105Of+y_Jw8HSFw@mail.gmail.com> <994c4462-ef24-6d46-3bec-8aa5e14b9f78@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <994c4462-ef24-6d46-3bec-8aa5e14b9f78@joelhalpern.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:25:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sy80-74g4cgKESwmdn3WSNjU_2XsjkChH9_8-ELnytC_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007d488f059cef44de"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ikgTPhs7fAitPCbqAolJKtdingU>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 04:25:48 -0000

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:31 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> Rob, this document deliberately addresses a very narrow issue that while
> admittedly rare has come up a few times.
>

It would help if you could describe the documents your draft applies to:

Document Classes Reviewed by the IESG
1) Protocol Actions
2) Document Actions (WG)
3) Document Actions (Individual)
4) Document Actions (from RFC-Editor)

I'm assuming the draft does not apply to #1, since those would not be
Informational or Experimental. If the draft is not intended to apply to #4
(even as an "end run"), that would be helpful to state.

That leaves #2 or #3. If the draft is concerned about #3, I think it
should state what the IESG is to do if the draft reappears as individual
submission.

If the document is about #2, that would be good to state as well.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email