IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "duplicate"

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 17 November 2010 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7EB3A68B9 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.804, BAYES_00=-2.599, FR_3TAG_3TAG=1.758, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8JWJtjLDtaE for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3003:2::4:11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B01A3A680C for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CF631C0145; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:02:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9886B1C00DF; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:02:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C31A7B0037; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:02:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:02:46 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20101117090246.GA29352@nic.fr>
References: <AANLkTinUGf=2MKxnBvaiy-9UQJbDfQVwb-zpDx=L0BAO@mail.gmail.com> <20101113084026.GB23318@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <usg4e6tkoo55fk4jscukn4jdkkp8s8pa4d@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <usg4e6tkoo55fk4jscukn4jdkkp8s8pa4d@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>, link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "duplicate"
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:02:03 -0000

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:46:40AM +0100,
 Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote 
 a message of 21 lines which said:

> (That is a very bad example, an XML document that is in NFC cannot have
> the same Infoset as an XML document that is not in NFC, even Canonical
> XML does not emply character normalization if the input is UTF-8.)

OK, I did not use the word Infoset properly. I should have say "the
same content" (where Content is not defined formally).

A better example:

<foo></foo>

is not a "duplicate" of:

<foo/>

which may be disconcerting.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email