Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering the 'search' link relation type
"Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org> Wed, 03 November 2010 16:45 UTC
Return-Path: <mike@jay.w3.org>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FD528C10F for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HXsY4NwnDMa3 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D8B28C0FF for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=MikeSmith.local) by jay.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mike@jay.w3.org>) id 1PDgSb-0001NN-G8; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:45:17 -0400
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:45:16 +0900
From: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Message-ID: <20101103164516.GI3616@sideshowbarker>
References: <D27FA5A2-4541-40B9-809C-FAEDC827FCCE@mnot.net> <AANLkTin+UXagypAFGCAOpsx-kBqyfwThMRsaQDLf1EVx@mail.gmail.com> <2BCEFDD3-2A6A-49F8-99B0-EC68F9D09FB6@mnot.net> <AANLkTikiYOJdjFhWX8Fq2KYQQVqmCDOU_PFQzpjD8SQm@mail.gmail.com> <C5488138-596F-40F0-9AFB-6DBB662B34EF@mnot.net> <AANLkTinSPfHP0hvvDHJ69Mm95E3a4Onq1BsMJnsExfAS@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinSPfHP0hvvDHJ69Mm95E3a4Onq1BsMJnsExfAS@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/r6164+poontang (2010-10-13 07:38:30+09:00)
Cc: DeWitt Clinton <dclinton@gmail.com>, link-relations@ietf.org, opensearch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering the 'search' link relation type
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:45:12 -0000
Updated request (in full): Relation Name: search Description: Gives a link to a resource that can be used to search through the current document and its related pages. Reference: http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Autodiscovery_in_HTML.2FXHTML DeWitt Clinton <dclinton@gmail.com>, 2010-11-02 22:01 -0700: > Yes, please. > > -DeWitt > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > > OK. If that's the case, should the registration just have: > > > > > Reference: > > > http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1 > > > > > > ? > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > On 03/11/2010, at 3:58 PM, DeWitt Clinton wrote: > > > > > If the designated experts are comfortable with that approach — and it > > sounds like you might be, otherwise you wouldn't have asked — I'd personally > > prefer that, considering the 'search' relation name is used in multiple > > contexts for the same purpose, not exclusively HTML(5). > > > > > > Thanks for asking, > > > > > > -DeWitt > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > > Thanks, DeWitt. > > > > > > One thing; I'm wondering if it makes more sense to list the OpenSearch > > link directly as the reference, rather than going through the HTML5 one. > > > > > > E.g., the registration could be: > > > > > > Relation Name: > > > search > > > > > > Description: > > > Gives a link to a resource that can be used to search through > > > the current document and its related pages. > > > > > > Reference: > > > > > http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Autodiscovery_in_HTML.2FXHTML > > > > > > Notes: > > > See also: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-search > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? Mike? > > > > > > > > > On 03/11/2010, at 3:21 PM, DeWitt Clinton wrote: > > > > > > > No objection at all, (speaking as unofficial spec editor). Very glad > > to see this happen, and thank you to Michael Smith and the W3C HTML WG for > > making the proposal. > > > > > > > > That URL is stable, and has not changed in several years, and we would > > of course be sure to preserve it with a redirect in the event anything ever > > moved. > > > > > > > > That said, the full URL appears truncated in the registration > > application. It currently reads: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Autodiscovery_in_HTML.2FXH > > > > > > > > Should be: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Autodiscovery_in_HTML.2FXHTML > > > > > > > > Thanks, Mark! > > > > > > > > -DeWitt > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > > > Hello OpenSearchers, > > > > > > > > I'm acting as a Designated Expert for the IANA Link Relation Type > > registry, defined by RFC5988 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988>. > > > > > > > > We've had a request <http://paramsr.us/tracker/issue18> from the W3C > > HTML WG to register the 'search' link relation type. > > > > > > > > Since OpenSearch has defined the 'search' relation type, and HTML5 > > refers to your specification to define its semantics, we wanted to make sure > > this registration was OK with the OpenSearch community before proceeding. Do > > you have any objections to them doing so? > > > > > > > > Additionally, we (the Designated Experts) wanted to double-check with > > you that the reference they give is a) appropriate, and b) stable. I.e., > > it's not going to change gratuitously. > > > > > > > > We'd appreciate a response as soon as possible, so that we can proceed > > with the registration. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "OpenSearch" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to opensearch@googlegroups.com. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > opensearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<opensearch%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/opensearch?hl=en. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > link-relations mailing list > > > > link-relations@ietf.org > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations > > > > > > -- > > > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
- [link-relations] Registering the 'search' link re… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… DeWitt Clinton
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… DeWitt Clinton
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… DeWitt Clinton
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… Michael(tm) Smith
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering… Michael(tm) Smith
- [link-relations] Fwd: [opensearch:393] Registerin… Mark Nottingham