Re: [link-relations] [opensearch:393] Registering the 'search' link relation type

Yes, please.

-DeWitt

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> OK. If that's the case, should the registration just have:
>
> > Reference:
> >  http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1
>
>
> ?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 03/11/2010, at 3:58 PM, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
>
> > If the designated experts are comfortable with that approach — and it
> sounds like you might be, otherwise you wouldn't have asked — I'd personally
> prefer that, considering the 'search' relation name is used in multiple
> contexts for the same purpose, not exclusively HTML(5).
> >
> > Thanks for asking,
> >
> > -DeWitt
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > Thanks, DeWitt.
> >
> > One thing; I'm wondering if it makes more sense to list the OpenSearch
> link directly as the reference, rather than going through the HTML5 one.
> >
> > E.g., the registration could be:
> >
> > Relation Name:
> >  search
> >
> > Description:
> >  Gives a link to a resource that can be used to search through
> >  the current document and its related pages.
> >
> > Reference:
> >
> http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Autodiscovery_in_HTML.2FXHTML
> >
> > Notes:
> >  See also: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-search
> >
> >
> > Thoughts? Mike?
> >
> >
> > On 03/11/2010, at 3:21 PM, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
> >
> > > No objection at all, (speaking as unofficial spec editor).  Very glad
> to see this happen, and thank you to Michael Smith and the W3C HTML WG for
> making the proposal.
> > >
> > > That URL is stable, and has not changed in several years, and we would
> of course be sure to preserve it with a redirect in the event anything ever
> moved.
> > >
> > > That said, the full URL appears truncated in the registration
> application.  It currently reads:
> > >
> > >
> http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Autodiscovery_in_HTML.2FXH
> > >
> > > Should be:
> > >
> > >
> http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Autodiscovery_in_HTML.2FXHTML
> > >
> > > Thanks, Mark!
> > >
> > > -DeWitt
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > > Hello OpenSearchers,
> > >
> > > I'm acting as a Designated Expert for the IANA Link Relation Type
> registry, defined by RFC5988 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988>.
> > >
> > > We've had a request <http://paramsr.us/tracker/issue18> from the W3C
> HTML WG to register the 'search' link relation type.
> > >
> > > Since OpenSearch has defined the 'search' relation type, and HTML5
> refers to your specification to define its semantics, we wanted to make sure
> this registration was OK with the OpenSearch community before proceeding. Do
> you have any objections to them doing so?
> > >
> > > Additionally, we (the Designated Experts) wanted to double-check with
> you that the reference they give is a) appropriate, and b) stable. I.e.,
> it's not going to change gratuitously.
> > >
> > > We'd appreciate a response as soon as possible, so that we can proceed
> with the registration.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "OpenSearch" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to opensearch@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> opensearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<opensearch%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/opensearch?hl=en.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > link-relations mailing list
> > > link-relations@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>