Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

Support!

Jordi

El 11/1/24 a les 18:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) ha escrit:
>
> I support moving this document to standard track
>
> Fabio
>
> *From: *lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Luigi Iannone 
> <ggx@gigix.net>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM
> *To: *LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *lisp-chairs@ietf.org <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
>
> Hi All,
>
> Happy new year!
>
> As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name 
> encoding document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.
>
> Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change 
> and that deployment experience is added to the document.
>
> Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with 
> the change.
>
> Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are 
> against.
>
> (Silence does not count)
>
> Please reply.
>
> Ciao
>
> L.
>
>
>
>     Begin forwarded message:
>
>     *From: *"Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)"
>     <natal=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
>
>     *Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding*
>
>     *Date: *December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
>
>     *To: *"lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has
>     been posted. The document is in good shape and minor identified
>     nits have been fixed. Please find the review here:
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/>
>
>     However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the
>     document is in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given
>     that there are known implementations of the spec and that it has
>     been running in production for some time, my suggestion is to
>     consider moving this document to Standards track instead.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Alberto
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     lisp mailing list
>     lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp