Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

[Victor Moreno <[e-mail]>]

I support moving this document to the standards track.

Victor

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:51 AM Jordi Paillissé <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Support!
>
> Jordi
> El 11/1/24 a les 18:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) ha escrit:
>
> I support moving this document to standard track
>
>
>
> Fabio
>
>
>
> *From: *lisp <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> on behalf of
> Luigi Iannone <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM
> *To: *LISP mailing list list <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Happy new year!
>
>
>
> As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding
> document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.
>
>
>
> Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and
> that deployment experience is added to the document.
>
>
>
> Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with the
> change.
>
>
>
> Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are
> against.
>
> (Silence does not count)
>
>
>
> Please reply.
>
>
>
> Ciao
>
>
>
> L.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> *From: *"Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)"
> <natal=[e-mail]> <natal=[e-mail]>
>
> *Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding*
>
> *Date: *December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
>
> *To: *"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has been
> posted. The document is in good shape and minor identified nits have been
> fixed. Please find the review here:
>
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/
>
>
>
> However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the document
> is in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given that there are
> known implementations of the spec and that it has been running in
> production for some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this document
> to Standards track instead.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alberto
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing [e-mail]://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>