IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Mon, 29 January 2024 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC20C14F71C for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:29:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qXZ0qEe9oEhi for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21495C14E515 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33ae42033e2so1472541f8f.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:29:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706534965; x=1707139765; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=conRv+buJhqmmFwn7HBTy2rJSq4CvxxuiECNSgr6DAo=; b=1SHafYp6HvMqBs3VeioBrP0ZmAjUpiZyw7ruGNL2JnD6Z0XZngSu0LM2A6RsvlhN9P MvndSnpEWMFyg/vtz4YeKF0cE0xUs3VnBydGneF4omYOkDB/ZYNhL8gfDJPdCSkLyFI7 B4nythWxwb2dWdTy9Vse9bkfKpHNxGs4CRD0PPYkNXa6g0mTuM5ju9v/CyzuKIz4mQ76 VqQ74YfK+QigCq1DkFgqsM2EY8WNE1AHBm4h100uZbkF9dOD34daE23pK+Tb0zGD173g HL4+yl3JIjlUOr7PBtFnUBTYAWdOnCFV3wfuluZhZWrr4r063mAc4Q0QaiIrMQz4g9uP wGqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706534965; x=1707139765; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=conRv+buJhqmmFwn7HBTy2rJSq4CvxxuiECNSgr6DAo=; b=OWo6RIXn5CHkAJcVZWvqjvh5Y1KnLPrGrUyrY0Y0zhyZ1Yhtobks+8xZjnfTy2A3io pZxug3cQ3b8SUMtbEbCAkC2iZat2c7Me6u3oHIPNgUe7Zzsqxrfv0c0rDLRuuwqZHeFi V17hsmYkGSIBxAdA0YjxtXlMHiv/vHUFQ31mMEOM06qDic5XbylQ7RwlVV3Cm30dn8Z7 05xwzIR4JD3u4XNw1fi2XuYKjxKo7lDRtnOBn7wQi13FLqFtJI52IZQvGk1BOhuI+EGI TNGqq0Id0NqA3tzQPmpo9reykqbBEl2RpBqSvy4C28QdzsdtXPnAnSMF70LuFLkWzG7g ze/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz97pWabe834qI7l51jjLuuUwIxErI3ENgGLrV7Rk5Qb5C6dT+Z eiZsEpfRlNS59lODBa0H3l72ykHqEKgQs/MTR2L3+6jGt3l/7K4qaeN2OuENaYphnwCTp+XAQcM YZsk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFcIyvvQIUM9gvyPu20uKpbv36VQ8pb3hehHHDcBpjt1lFNfhx1lNvREstpQlLWW1OX5ZZEQA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d86:0:b0:33a:f448:8fe7 with SMTP id l6-20020a5d6d86000000b0033af4488fe7mr1219683wrs.69.1706534964641; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (91-167-176-17.subs.proxad.net. [91.167.176.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck8-20020a5d5e88000000b003392986585esm8215207wrb.41.2024.01.29.05.29.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:29:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <24D81EC2-10D7-4EAB-85F6-CE2D01098534@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1C0C90DF-76EE-4A51-B429-A8E505746FB0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:28:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <A9558658-31AD-4197-8232-75D982D22D2B@gigix.net>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <BYAPR11MB35913B8053FC21D7D0A5D082B69EA@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <A9558658-31AD-4197-8232-75D982D22D2B@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/YkhHwLI4EIT2jqT6tiXJWV-T25A>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 13:29:32 -0000

Hi All,

This call is now closed.
 
In the last two weeks several emails have shown support in moving the document to standard track.

As such it seems that the WG has consensus on this change.

The authors are invited to submit a new revision of the document  and change intended status.
The new revision has to include a section about deployment experience. 

Ciao

L.



> On Jan 11, 2024, at 13:52, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Happy new year! 
> 
> As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.
> 
> Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and that deployment experience is added to the document.
> 
> Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with the change.
> 
> Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are against.
> (Silence does not count)
> 
> Please reply.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
>  
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)" <natal=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
>> Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding
>> Date: December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
>> To: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
>> 
>> Hi all,
>>  
>> The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has been posted. The document is in good shape and minor identified nits have been fixed. Please find the review here:
>>  
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/
>>  
>> However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the document is in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given that there are known implementations of the spec and that it has been running in production for some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this document to Standards track instead.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Alberto
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email