Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

[Lori Jakab <[e-mail]>]

Support.

-Lori

On 1/22/24 11:55 PM, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) wrote:
>
> I also support moving this document to Standard track
>
> *From: *lisp <[e-mail]> on behalf of Victor Moreno 
> <vimoreno=[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Friday, January 12, 2024 at 7:57 AM
> *To: *Jordi Paillissé <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard 
> track?
>
> I support moving this document to the standards track.
>
> Victor
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:51 AM Jordi Paillissé 
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>     Support!
>
>     Jordi
>
>     El 11/1/24 a les 18:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) ha escrit:
>
>         I support moving this document to standard track
>
>         Fabio
>
>         *From: *lisp <[e-mail]>
>         <mailto:[e-mail]> on behalf of Luigi Iannone
>         <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>
>         *Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM
>         *To: *LISP mailing list list <[e-mail]>
>         <mailto:[e-mail]>
>         *Cc: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
>         <mailto:[e-mail]>
>         *Subject: *[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to
>         standard track?
>
>         Hi All,
>
>         Happy new year!
>
>         As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the
>         name encoding document, it is suggested to move the document
>         to standard track.
>
>         Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this
>         change and that deployment experience is added to the document.
>
>         Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree
>         with the change.
>
>         Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or
>         you are against.
>
>         (Silence does not count)
>
>         Please reply.
>
>         Ciao
>
>         L.
>
>             Begin forwarded message:
>
>             *From: *"Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)"
>             <natal=[e-mail]>
>             <mailto:natal=[e-mail]>
>
>             *Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of
>             draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding*
>
>             *Date: *December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
>
>             *To: *"[e-mail]" <mailto:[e-mail]>
>             <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>
>
>             Hi all,
>
>             The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name
>             Encoding has been posted. The document is in good shape
>             and minor identified nits have been fixed. Please find the
>             review here:
>
>             https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/
>             <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/>
>
>             However, as part of the review, it was raised the question
>             if the document is in the right stream (currently in
>             Experimental). Given that there are known implementations
>             of the spec and that it has been running in production for
>             some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this
>             document to Standards track instead.
>
>             Thanks,
>
>             Alberto
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             lisp mailing list
>             [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>             https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>             <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         lisp mailing list
>
>         [e-mail]
>
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     lisp mailing list
>     [e-mail]
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>