IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]

Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 26 July 2017 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77DA132054; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLouryBi_cWt; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA5A9131CEE; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v105so103176817wrb.0; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Bzw2tR0OVoPvxw4j8VU9qBZJmEQUJPXtbmEmfvgViOM=; b=KZLDAB4lyNVqO71T+IG00a8ds8bGm1fQOEkEindOFMCFfWof6uCu0E8JyqgI2HyoBT js26L8IWIcj608olwOxWbXCGsOpDlCLlkv/flcCaFsmSrhZzlBHbT4tsaQmWk5ggDW7c r3+tYg5dDvYnPKeVU4fYVUrTKLbxQej0Q9Jc3DpM1jGxUSBBNvJB4gMge1I0XEPvEZNS bidl/9FE3QJl0dx5P8gKFQFP5zruOG+gTXxe6gCz9cxlys88p1DwAmmcW9K4PSRFzCrK 25QxhCuNJ003Hv0sqHg5dngp2L1n9gBKbKRnbiJbBgZ0iMHtXm9IyPkeM8h/tZFrFrvw BYxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Bzw2tR0OVoPvxw4j8VU9qBZJmEQUJPXtbmEmfvgViOM=; b=WZTN8WNsjcMa9vIWZf+kshIA3QwIICej1U9iLR5zJtClM9rZ/g9udPOz5VpSpn9qHx eZECy4lW8MbIhTSHv/R+j32j5FWZ58ih03YMU7cEXFZQu7g2qWVrBcTC9XFhmqMwQigN 4UJJIhbRHlKqqOlNmjI3zwH/vVMGXieHvQJVxzGiMILjwrxnnCvhgwNHPfyb1oVH29Di vnorlO3VnAACB7WpOH6frR6oFr8wz7pSiZ3gRdomwrrNfQ1ODaLIApAf9HBBiN3p3ll5 hk+qDBil29pBCxfLT/jPfzxpH/Fwgld8hLjSgoAT55f3hRQCbc2fVF8IBLrbRmXCIT6Y gsew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112mLrakrlJW8415DxR4OgeDS848wO5oiktxLsHEFqj2fDAApGro A4g8MQDI8QpoOUxOgyXkF9uGU3n38A==
X-Received: by 10.223.152.147 with SMTP id w19mr1247849wrb.118.1501084565972; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.167.10 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D59E010B.2CC055%rrahman@cisco.com>
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net> <7AFC6BD1-5E44-4146-AF97-DF0EBE340B78@gigix.net> <D59E010B.2CC055%rrahman@cisco.com>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxoLNTG_S7Jx6HUW32PFCUMEWJ6X020+JoLJXHJvDOBeYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c5c485530ed05553a7c62"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/1B7f4BCiEG_oHNiaVrz81wm5Qx4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:56:10 -0000

Support

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:19 AM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com>
wrote:

> I support WG adoption of draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf.
>
> From: lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org>> on
> behalf of Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net<mailto:ggx@gigix.net>>
> Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:16 AM
> To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>
> Cc: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org>" <
> lisp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org>>
> Subject: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF
> [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
>
> The call ends August 10th 2017 !
>
> Luigi
>
> On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:41, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net<mailto:ggx@
> gigix.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-
> vendor-lcaf-00.txt
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00]
> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email