Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
Jordi Paillissé Vilanova <jordip@ac.upc.edu> Thu, 27 July 2017 09:26 UTC
Return-Path: <jordip@ac.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D95127978; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 02:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JSMMwrfuk8CO; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 02:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roura.ac.upc.es (roura.ac.upc.edu [147.83.33.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85204127180; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 02:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from correu-2.ac.upc.es (correu-2.ac.upc.es [147.83.30.92]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6R9QcRb021512; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:26:38 +0200
Received: from [147.83.35.194] (dync-35-194.ac.upc.es [147.83.35.194]) by correu-2.ac.upc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A22E77CF; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:26:33 +0200 (CEST)
To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net> <CA+YHcKHatYzheK_XhxfxVf=F7Nd65qhza6KR3Re2caB1xrmcZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jordi Paillissé Vilanova <jordip@ac.upc.edu>
Message-ID: <5716160e-5001-78c8-e1e1-8eab4177a58c@ac.upc.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:26:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+YHcKHatYzheK_XhxfxVf=F7Nd65qhza6KR3Re2caB1xrmcZg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A32F4E0900348713FE4DFD44"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/N6ITDTzwBUzXzvLor0xUIig9is0>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:26:46 -0000
Support. Jordi El 26/07/17 a les 23:19, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal ha escrit: > As co-author, I support this draft for WG adoption. > > Alberto > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net > <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > During the 99th IETF authors of the > document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt > [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00>] > asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on > adoption. > > This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm > the meeting outcome. > The call ends on August 3rd 2017. > > Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of > approval or disapproval. > > Recall that: > > - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG > is expected to > modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that > the content is solid. > Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to > see changes to its content. > > - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state > your reasons why, > and explain what it would take to address your concerns. > > - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those > issues and we can > begin a dialog about how best to address them. > Luigi and Joel > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
- [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LC… Luigi Iannone
- [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Sp… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Vina Ermagan (vermagan)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Fabio Maino
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Jordi Paillissé Vilanova
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Richard Li
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Florin Coras
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Lori Jakab
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal